ArticleLancet (London, England)2011
From GWAS to clinical utility in Parkinson's disease.
Article in Lancet (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association of LRRK2 R1628P variant with Parkinson's disease in Ethnic Han-Chinese and subgroup population.Scientific reports · 2016Pooled it
- A review of the role of electronic health record in genomic research.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2014Review
- Next generation sequencing and the future of genetic diagnosis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2014Review
- RNA-Seq and human complex diseases: recent accomplishments and future perspectives.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21292316What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.