Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21289132›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2011

Temporally selective processing of communication signals by auditory midbrain neurons.

Taffeta M Elliott, Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard, Darcy B Kelley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Time, space, memory and brain-body rhythms.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reciprocal Matched Filtering in the Inner Ear of the African Clawed Frog (Xenopus laevis).Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2020
    Article
  8. Generation, Coordination, and Evolution of Neural Circuits for Vocal Communication.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Sex differences and endocrine regulation of auditory-evoked, neural responses in African clawed frogs (Xenopus).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Representation of particle motion in the auditory midbrain of a developing anuran.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2015
    Article
  17. Treefrogs as animal models for research on auditory scene analysis and the cocktail party problem.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2015
    Article
  18. Auditory brainstem responses in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis): effects of frequency, level, sex and size.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2014
    Article
  19. Time computations in anuran auditory systems.Frontiers in physiology · 2014
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Taffeta M ElliottDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA. taffeta@berkeley.edu
Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard
Darcy B Kelley

Funding

NEUROBIOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32HD007430 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GRUEBER, WESLEY B · 1999 to 2017
$6.8M
NEURAL SUBSTRATES FOR REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIORR01NS023684 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI KELLEY, DARCY B · 1985 to 2012
$3.8M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007430NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS023684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perception of the temporal structure of acoustic signals contributes critically to vocal signaling. In the aquatic clawed frog Xenopus laevis, calls differ primarily in the temporal parameter of click rate, which conveys sexual identity and reproductive state. We show here that an ensemble of auditory neurons in the laminar nucleus of the torus semicircularis (TS) of X. laevis specializes in encoding vocalization click rates. We recorded single TS units while pure tones, natural calls, and synthetic clicks were presented directly to the tympanum via a vibration-stimulation probe. Synthesized click rates ranged from 4 to 50 Hz, the rate at which the clicks begin to overlap. Frequency selectivity and temporal processing were characterized using response-intensity curves, temporal-discharge patterns, and autocorrelations of reduplicated responses to click trains. Characteristic frequencies ranged from 140 to 3,250 Hz, with minimum thresholds of -90 dB re 1 mm/s at 500 Hz and -76 dB at 1,100 Hz near the dominant frequency of female clicks. Unlike units in the auditory nerve and dorsal medullary nucleus, most toral units respond selectively to the behaviorally relevant temporal feature of the rate of clicks in calls. The majority of neurons (85%) were selective for click rates, and this selectivity remained unchanged over sound levels 10 to 20 dB above threshold. Selective neurons give phasic, tonic, or adapting responses to tone bursts and click trains. Some algorithms that could compute temporally selective receptive fields are described.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationAcoustic StimulationAlgorithmsAnimalsCochlear NerveElectrophysiological PhenomenaFemaleMaleMesencephalonSexual Behavior, AnimalVocalization, AnimalXenopus laevis

Identifiers

PMID21289132
PMCPMC3075307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.