Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21289090›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2011

The proteomics of quiescent and nonquiescent cell differentiation in yeast stationary-phase cultures.

George S Davidson, Ray M Joe, Sushmita Roy, Osorio Meirelles, Chris P Allen, Melissa R Wilson, Phillip H Tapia, Elaine E Manzanilla, Anne E Dodson, Swagata Chakraborty and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Quiescence inAnnual review of genetics · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Heterogeneity of Starved Yeast Cells in IFFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

George S DavidsonBiology Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
Ray M Joe
Sushmita Roy
Osorio Meirelles
Chris P Allen
Melissa R Wilson
Phillip H Tapia
Elaine E Manzanilla
Anne E Dodson
Swagata Chakraborty
Mark Carter
Susan Young
Bruce Edwards
Larry Sklar
Margaret Werner-Washburne
University of New Mexico · US

Funding

Yeast Biology ConsortiumU54MH084690 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI TEGOS, GEORGE P · 2008 to 2013
$14.4M
UNM Initiative to Maximize Student Diversity (IMSD)R25GM060201 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI WERNER-WASHBURNE, MARGRET C. · 2000 to 2017
$9.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-060201NIGMS NIH HHS GM-0975149NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM060201NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH084690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As yeast cultures enter stationary phase in rich, glucose-based medium, differentiation of two major subpopulations of cells, termed quiescent and nonquiescent, is observed. Differences in mRNA abundance between exponentially growing and stationary-phase cultures and quiescent and nonquiescent cells are known, but little was known about protein abundance in these cells. To measure protein abundance in exponential and stationary-phase cultures, the yeast GFP-fusion library (4159 strains) was examined during exponential and stationary phases, using high-throughput flow cytometry (HyperCyt). Approximately 5% of proteins in the library showed twofold or greater changes in median fluorescence intensity (abundance) between the two conditions. We examined 38 strains exhibiting two distinct fluorescence-intensity peaks in stationary phase and determined that the two fluorescence peaks distinguished quiescent and nonquiescent cells, the two major subpopulations of cells in stationary-phase cultures. GFP-fusion proteins in this group were more abundant in quiescent cells, and half were involved in mitochondrial function, consistent with the sixfold increase in respiration observed in quiescent cells and the relative absence of Cit1p:GFP in nonquiescent cells. Finally, examination of quiescent cell-specific GFP-fusion proteins revealed symmetry in protein accumulation in dividing quiescent and nonquiescent cells after glucose exhaustion, leading to a new model for the differentiation of these cells.

Indexed as

ProteomicsCell CycleFlow CytometryGene Expression Regulation, FungalGreen Fluorescent ProteinsOxygen ConsumptionRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21289090
PMCPMC3069023
OpenAlexW2049665371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.