Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21288976›Full record

ArticleAnesthesia and analgesia2011

Parental recall of anesthesia information: informing the practice of informed consent.

Alan R Tait, Terri Voepel-Lewis, Virginia Gauger

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Decision aid prototype development for parents considering adenotonsillectomy for their children with sleep disordered breathing.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Not just a separate consent for anesthesia!Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alan R TaitDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. atait@umich.edu
Terri Voepel-Lewis
Virginia Gauger

Funding

Strategies to Optimize Communication of Informed Consent for Pediatric ResearchR01HD053594 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TAIT, ALAN R · 2007 to 2011
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD053594NICHD NIH HHS R01HD053594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformed consent is a process of sharing information that facilitates the individual patient's right to self-determination. Despite its importance in anesthesia practice, the process of informed consent is rarely audited or examined. As such, there are only limited data with respect to anesthesia consent practices, particularly within the pediatric setting. We designed this study, therefore, to examine the information that parents seek regarding their child's anesthesia, what they are told, who told them, and how much of the information they recall.

methodsParents of children undergoing a variety of elective surgical procedures were recruited while their child was in surgery. Parents were interviewed to determine their recall of their child's anesthetic plan, postoperative pain management, and attendant risks and benefits; and then surveyed regarding what information was sought and received, and how satisfied they were with the information.

resultsTwo hundred sixty-three parents were included. Although the majority (96.2%) recalled receiving information about how their child's anesthesia would be administered, only 51.1% recalled being given information about the risks of anesthesia and 42.4% recalled how side effects would be managed. Composite scores for parental recall of anesthesia information were generally poor (4.9 ± 2.5 of 10). Furthermore, 50% and 55.7% of parents had no recall of the risks or benefits of anesthesia, respectively, and 82.9% could not recall pain medication side effects. Recall of consent information provided by anesthesia providers was significantly better than when provided by surgical personnel (P < 0.01).

conclusionsResults showed that disclosure of anesthesia information to parents was often incomplete, and their recall thereof, was poor. The finding that recall of consent information provided by anesthesia providers was better than when provided by surgical personnel may serve to further the debate regarding the appropriate vehicles for anesthesia consent.

Indexed as

Mental RecallAdolescentAdultAnesthesia, GeneralChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInformed ConsentMaleMiddle AgedParental ConsentPatient Education as TopicSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID21288976
PMCPMC3073673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.