Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21288355›Full record

ReviewBMC infectious diseases2011

The GLEaMviz computational tool, a publicly available software to explore realistic epidemic spreading scenarios at the global scale.

Wouter Van den Broeck, Corrado Gioannini, Bruno Gonçalves, Marco Quaggiotto, Vittoria Colizza, Alessandro Vespignani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC infectious diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 282 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. The spread of non-native species.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. On some fundamental challenges in monitoring epidemics.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. COVID-19 prediction models: a systematic literature review.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Wouter Van den BroeckComputational Epidemiology Laboratory, Institute for Scientific Interchange (ISI), Turin, Italy.
Corrado Gioannini
Bruno Gonçalves
Marco Quaggiotto
Vittoria Colizza
Alessandro Vespignani
Institute for Scientific Interchange · ITIndiana University Bloomington · USPolitecnico di Milano · IT

Funding

EpiC: A Cyberinfrastructure that Supports the Plug-and-Play of Datasets & AlgoriR21DA024259 · NIDA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI BORNER, KATY, SHERMAN, STEVEN J · 2007 to 2010
$1.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA024259NIDA NIH HHS R21-DA024259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputational models play an increasingly important role in the assessment and control of public health crises, as demonstrated during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. Much research has been done in recent years in the development of sophisticated data-driven models for realistic computer-based simulations of infectious disease spreading. However, only a few computational tools are presently available for assessing scenarios, predicting epidemic evolutions, and managing health emergencies that can benefit a broad audience of users including policy makers and health institutions.

resultsWe present "GLEaMviz", a publicly available software system that simulates the spread of emerging human-to-human infectious diseases across the world. The GLEaMviz tool comprises three components: the client application, the proxy middleware, and the simulation engine. The latter two components constitute the GLEaMviz server. The simulation engine leverages on the Global Epidemic and Mobility (GLEaM) framework, a stochastic computational scheme that integrates worldwide high-resolution demographic and mobility data to simulate disease spread on the global scale. The GLEaMviz design aims at maximizing flexibility in defining the disease compartmental model and configuring the simulation scenario; it allows the user to set a variety of parameters including: compartment-specific features, transition values, and environmental effects. The output is a dynamic map and a corresponding set of charts that quantitatively describe the geo-temporal evolution of the disease. The software is designed as a client-server system. The multi-platform client, which can be installed on the user's local machine, is used to set up simulations that will be executed on the server, thus avoiding specific requirements for large computational capabilities on the user side.

conclusionsThe user-friendly graphical interface of the GLEaMviz tool, along with its high level of detail and the realism of its embedded modeling approach, opens up the platform to simulate realistic epidemic scenarios. These features make the GLEaMviz computational tool a convenient teaching/training tool as well as a first step toward the development of a computational tool aimed at facilitating the use and exploitation of computational models for the policy making and scenario analysis of infectious disease outbreaks.

Indexed as

PandemicsSoftwareCommunicable Disease ControlCommunicable DiseasesComputer SimulationDisease Transmission, InfectiousHumansModels, Statistical

Identifiers

PMID21288355
PMCPMC3048541
OpenAlexW2126393394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.