Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21288334›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2011

Utility and safety of draining pleural effusions in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ewan C Goligher, Jerome A Leis, Robert A Fowler, Ruxandra Pinto, Neill K J Adhikari, Niall D Ferguson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03231072 (Effects of the Pleural Effusion Drainage in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Monitored by Electrical Impedance Tomography and End-Expiratory Lung Volume), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03231072 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Effects of the Pleural Effusion Drainage in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Monitored by Electrical Impedance Tomography and End-Expiratory Lung Volume

TypeinterventionalSponsorCzech Technical University in PragueRan2017 to 2022Enrolled19ConditionsPleural Effusion, Drainage, Electric Impedance TomographyArmsElectrical Impedance Tomography record
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Ventilator-induced Lung Injury Promotes Inflammation within the Pleural Cavity.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prevalence, characteristics, drainage and outcome of radiologically diagnosed pleural effusions in critically ill patients.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Thoracic ultrasonography: a narrative review.Intensive care medicine · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ewan C GoligherInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care, Mount Sinai Hospital and the University Health Network, University of Toronto, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada.
Jerome A Leis
Robert A Fowler
Ruxandra Pinto
Neill K J Adhikari
Niall D Ferguson
Mount Sinai Hospital · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPleural effusions are frequently drained in mechanically ventilated patients but the benefits and risks of this procedure are not well established.

methodsWe performed a literature search of multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, HEALTHSTAR, CINAHL) up to April 2010 to identify studies reporting clinical or physiological outcomes of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients who underwent drainage of pleural effusions. Studies were adjudicated for inclusion independently and in duplicate. Data on duration of ventilation and other clinical outcomes, oxygenation and lung mechanics, and adverse events were abstracted in duplicate independently.

resultsNineteen observational studies (N = 1,124) met selection criteria. The mean PaO2:FiO2 ratio improved by 18% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5% to 33%, I2 = 53.7%, five studies including 118 patients) after effusion drainage. Reported complication rates were low for pneumothorax (20 events in 14 studies including 965 patients; pooled mean 3.4%, 95% CI 1.7 to 6.5%, I2 = 52.5%) and hemothorax (4 events in 10 studies including 721 patients; pooled mean 1.6%, 95% CI 0.8 to 3.3%, I2 = 0%). The use of ultrasound guidance (either real-time or for site marking) was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in the risk of pneumothorax (OR = 0.32; 95% CI 0.08 to 1.19). Studies did not report duration of ventilation, length of stay in the intensive care unit or hospital, or mortality.

conclusionsDrainage of pleural effusions in mechanically ventilated patients appears to improve oxygenation and is safe. We found no data to either support or refute claims of beneficial effects on clinically important outcomes such as duration of ventilation or length of stay.

Indexed as

DrainageRespiration, ArtificialControlled Clinical Trials as TopicCritical IllnessHumansPleural EffusionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21288334
PMCPMC3221976
OpenAlexW2119292420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.