Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21288204›Full record

ReviewASN neuro2011

The curious case of NG2 cells: transient trend or game changer?

Jean-Marie Mangin, Vittorio Gallo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ASN neuro, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Intrinsic organization of the corpus callosum.Frontiers in physiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Glial Cells Promote Myelin Formation and Elimination.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Dynamic Modulation of Myelination in Response to Visual Stimuli Alters Optic Nerve Conduction Velocity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Sleep and oligodendrocyte functions.Current sleep medicine reports · 2015
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Glial cell development and function in zebrafish.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jean-Marie ManginCenter for Neuroscience Research, Childrens National Medical Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA. jmangin@cnmcresearch.org
Vittorio Gallo
Children's National · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been 10 years since the seminal work of Dwight Bergles and collaborators demonstrated that NG2 (nerve/glial antigen 2)-expressing oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (NG2 cells) receive functional glutamatergic synapses from neurons (Bergles et al., 2000), contradicting the old dogma that only neurons possess the complex and specialized molecular machinery necessary to receive synapses. While this surprising discovery may have been initially shunned as a novelty item of undefined functional significance, the study of neuron-to-NG2 cell neurotransmission has since become a very active and exciting field of research. Many laboratories have now confirmed and extended the initial discovery, showing for example that NG2 cells can also receive inhibitory GABAergic synapses (Lin and Bergles, 2004) or that neuron-to-NG2 cell synaptic transmission is a rather ubiquitous phenomenon that has been observed in all brain areas explored so far, including white matter tracts (Kukley et al., 2007; Ziskin et al., 2007; Etxeberria et al., 2010). Thus, while still being in its infancy, this field of research has already brought many surprising and interesting discoveries, and has become part of a continuously growing effort in neuroscience to re-evaluate the long underestimated role of glial cells in brain function (Barres, 2008). However, this area of research is now reaching an important milestone and its long-term significance will be defined by its ability to uncover the still elusive function of NG2 cells and their synapses in the brain, rather than by its sensational but transient successes at upsetting the old order established by neuronal physiology. To participate in the effort to facilitate such a transition, here we propose a critical review of the latest findings in the field of NG2 cell physiology--discussing how they inform us on the possible function(s) of NG2 cells in the brain--and we present some personal views on new directions the field could benefit from in order to achieve lasting significance.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigensCalciumCell DifferentiationChondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycan 4HumansMyelin SheathNerve RegenerationNeuronsOligodendrogliaProteoglycansStem CellsSynapsesAntigensCalciumChondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycan 4Proteoglycans

Identifiers

PMID21288204
PMCPMC3052864
OpenAlexW1967868091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.