Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21287524›Full record

ArticleCancer2011

Clinical implications of UGT1A1*28 genotype testing in colorectal cancer patients.

Katerina Shulman, Ilana Cohen, Ofra Barnett-Griness, Abraham Kuten, Stephen B Gruber, Flavio Lejbkowicz, Gad Rennert

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Multicenter, Randomized, Phase III Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Capecitabine and Irinotecan Guided byJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Trial
  7. Clinical Implications ofPharmaceutics · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Comparison ofOncology research · 2022
    Observational
  11. All You Need to Know AboutJCO oncology practice · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Relationship betweenOncoTargets and therapy · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Katerina ShulmanCHS National Cancer Control Center and Department of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, Carmel Medical Center and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Ilana Cohen
Ofra Barnett-Griness
Abraham Kuten
Stephen B Gruber
Flavio Lejbkowicz
Gad Rennert
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILCarmel Medical Center · ILRambam Health Care Campus · ILUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY OF COLORECTAL CANCERR01CA081488 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GRUBER, STEPHEN B · 1999 to 2008
$9.2M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA81488NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS R01 CA081488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastatic colorectal cancer is frequently treated with irinotecan, a topoisomerase-I inhibitor. The UGT1A1 gene encodes for an enzyme that metabolizes irinotecan, and its genetic variants were shown to be associated with increased drug toxicity. We evaluated clinical outcomes associated with the UGT1A1*28 variant.

methodsThe study included 329 colorectal cancer patients from the Israeli population-based Molecular Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer study who were treated with a chemotherapy regimen that included irinotecan. Patients with metastases or disease recurrence were followed up for a median period of 2 years after occurrence of the event. Study end points were appearance of grade 3-4 hematological and gastroenterological toxicity, hospitalization due to toxic events (mostly neutropenia, fever, diarrhea, or vomiting), length of hospitalization, and overall survival. UGT1A1*28 was genotyped from peripheral blood DNA by fragment analysis and reported as number of TATA sequence repeats in the promoter of the gene.

resultsThe 7/7 variant of UGT1A1*28 was detected in 11.9% of the 329 participants. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity was significantly higher in 7/7 carriers compared with 6/7 and 6/6 carriers (48.0%,10.2%, and 7.7% respectively; P < .001), as was the risk of toxicity-related hospitalization (45.8%, 25.3%, and 14.4% respectively; P = .001). Both short-term death within 2 months of treatment start (12.8%, 5.2%, and 2.9%, respectively) and median overall survival (1.6, 2.0, and 2.4 years, respectively; P = .01) were significantly worse in the 7/7 carriers. The age/stage-adjusted hazard ratio for patients with the 7/7 genotype compared with 6/6 was 1.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.3).

conclusionsThe UGT1A1*28 7/7 genotype is strongly associated with severe hematological toxicity and higher hospitalization rate and predicts lower survival of colorectal cancer in users of irinotecan.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGenotypeGlucuronosyltransferaseHumansIrinotecanLeukopeniaMaleMiddle AgedNeutropeniaUGT1A1 EnzymeAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinGlucuronosyltransferaseIrinotecanUGT1A1 Enzyme

Identifiers

PMID21287524
PMCPMC3117027
OpenAlexW2171168074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.