Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21287223›Full record

ReviewTechniques in coloproctology2011

Pouch-related dysplasia and adenocarcinoma following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

J W Um, A E M'Koma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Techniques in coloproctology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Rectal Cancer and Radiation in Colitis.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Inflammatory bowel disease: an expanding global health problem.Clinical medicine insights. Gastroenterology · 2013
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J W UmDepartment of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
A E M'Koma
Korea University · KRMeharry Medical College · US

Funding

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
Technologies and Resources CoreU54MD007593 · NIMHD · MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE · PI ADUNYAH, SAMUEL EVANS · 2012 to 2018
$24.7M
ROLES OF STATS AND SRC KINASES IN GROWTH CONTROL BY IL17U54CA091408 · NCI · MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE · PI ADUNYAH, SAMUEL EVANS · 2001 to 2010
$20.2M
TrainingU54CA163072 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Karen Marie Winkfield · 2011 to 2026
$20.1M
Translational Pathology CoreU54CA163069 · NCI · MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE · PI BALLARD, BILLY RAY · 2011 to 2025
$18.8M
NCI NIH HHS 3U54CA091408-09S1NCI NIH HHS U54 CA091408NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163069NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163072NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRestorative proctocolectomy (RPC) is the criterion standard surgical treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). Restorative proctocolectomy is indicated for UC that is refractory to medical treatment, for emergency conditions, and in case of neoplastic transformation. The procedure substantially reduces the risk of UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasia. However, after RPC surgery, even with mucosectomy, cancers of the pouch and/or the anal-transitional zone (ATZ) have been reported with increasing frequency since the first report in 1984. This review highlights pouch-related dysplastic and neoplastic transformation, prevalence and adverse events, risk factors and surveillance following surgery for UC.

methodsReports in the literature about patients undergoing pouch surgery from different institutions reported through May 2010 were reviewed to identify patients who developed these complications, and an attempt was made to develop a rational follow-up policy based on the data available.

resultsTo date, there are 43 reported cancers of the pouch or inlet after RPC for UC: 16 from retrospective series, 1 from a prospective study, and 26 in case reports. Thirty patients underwent mucosectomy and 13 had stapled anastomoses. To date, the number of 28 patients has been diagnosed with dysplasia after RPC for UC. Mucosectomy was performed in 27 of them and in 1 a stapled anastomosis was constructed without mucosectomy. In all cases reviewed, the time interval from the onset of UC to dysplasia/neoplasia was over 10 years.

conclusionNeoplastic lesions occurring in UC patients after RPC have been shown to be absolutely inevitable. Even mucosectomy does not completely eliminate the risk. There is little evidence to support routine biopsy of the ileal mucosa or the anal-transition zone except in patients with histological type C changes, sclerosing cholangitis, and unremitting pouchitis in the ileal mucosa. Such patients should be selected for endoscopic surveillance to detect dysplasia preceding pouch adenocarcinoma.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAnus NeoplasmsColitis, UlcerativeColonic PouchesHumansIntestinal MucosaPouchitisPrecancerous ConditionsProctocolectomy, Restorative

Identifiers

PMID21287223
PMCPMC4086905
OpenAlexW2078569964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.