ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2011
Inherited neuropathies.
Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- An exploratory randomised double-blind and placebo-controlled phase 2 study of a combination of baclofen, naltrexone and sorbitol (PXT3003) in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2014Trial
- TSPO PET selectively detects the denervated skeletal muscle district remodeling after experimental peripheral nerve injury.EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- Current Treatment Methods for Charcot-Marie-Tooth Diseases.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- People with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and COVID-19: Impaired physical conditions due to the lockdown. An International cross-sectional survey.Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2020Article
- Exploiting Sphingo- and Glycerophospholipid Impairment to Select Effective Drugs and Biomarkers for CMT1A.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- Hand Rehabilitation Treatment for Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease: An Open Label Pilot Study.Journal of neurology & neurophysiology · 2018Article
- Soluble Neuregulin1 is strongly up-regulated in the rat model of Charcot-Marie-Tooth 1A disease.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2018Article
- Support of Nerve Conduction by Respiring Myelin Sheath: Role of Connexons.Molecular neurobiology · 2016Article
- Endogenous antibodies contribute to macrophage-mediated demyelination in a mouse model for CMT1B.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2015Article
- Postural stabilization and balance assessment in Charcot-Marie-Tooth 1A subjects.Gait & posture · 2014Article
- Progesterone antagonist therapy in a Pelizaeus-Merzbacher mouse model.American journal of human genetics · 2014Article
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 2B disease-causing RAB7A mutant proteins show altered interaction with the neuronal intermediate filament peripherin.Acta neuropathologica · 2013Article
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and intracellular traffic.Progress in neurobiology · 2012Review
- Colony-stimulating factor-1 mediates macrophage-related neural damage in a model for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1X.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2012Article
- Membranous Nephropathy in a Patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease: Association of Myelin Mutations.Indian journal of nephrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
opinion statementInherited peripheral neuropathies are among the most common hereditary diseases of the nervous system. Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease, also known from previous classifications as hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (HMSN), is certainly the most common inherited neuropathy. In the past several years, various treatments for CMT have been proposed, although specific therapies are not yet available. In clinical practice, rehabilitative strategies remain the most helpful therapeutic approach to these patients. There is still a lack of consensus on the best way to rehabilitate patients affected by CMT. Based on our personal experience and on a review of the literature, we first recommend the prescription of ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) for patients affected by CMT; the choice of which patient, which AFO, and when to apply it depends on the individual condition of each patient and on the experience of the physician/therapist. Second, adaptive equipment (eg, button hook, long-handled shoehorn, elastic shoe laces) is available to compensate for hand deformities, sensory loss, and weakness. Third, moderate to intense strength training and aerobic exercise are well tolerated by patients affected by CMT; further studies are needed to establish whether these approaches are effective in improving their motor function and strength. There is not enough evidence to recommend muscle stretching exercises or proprioceptive kinesiotherapy, although in our experience both approaches may be helpful in selected CMT patients to prevent tendon retractions, muscle tightening, and loss of strength, and to improve balance. There is growing knowledge of the underlying genetic defects and molecular pathophysiology in CMT. To date, only a few clinical trials in CMT patients have been performed. A neurotrophic factor, neurotrophin 3, was used in a small sample of CMT1A patients with promising results, but it has not been tested in a larger cohort and there is currently no reason to suggest this therapy for CMT1A neuropathy. Based on positive results in an animal model of CMT1A, three trials with ascorbic acid (AA) were completed in a large number of patients with this neuropathy, with results that were negative overall. Therefore, it is not possible to recommend the use of AA in CMT1A patients at this time, but the results of a larger Italian-UK study and an American trial with higher doses of AA are still awaited. It is important to remember that a superimposed inflammatory/disimmune process may complicate the course of the neuropathy; in this case, severe worsening (especially motor) in a matter of weeks or months is a "red flag" that should suggest immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment such as steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, or plasma exchange. In fact, steroid-sensitive cases of HMSN were described many years ago, well before the genetic diagnosis was available. Symptomatic treatment to reduce neuropathic and nociceptive pain, both of which have been reported in patients affected by CMT, should be prescribed according to recently published guidelines for the therapy of pain. No evidence suggests any specific surgical intervention or change in diet or lifestyle for patients affected by various types of CMT.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.