Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21286935›Full record

SynthesisDigestive diseases and sciences2011

Methane on breath testing is associated with constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

David Kunkel, Robert J Basseri, Marc D Makhani, Kelly Chong, Christopher Chang, Mark Pimentel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03763175 (Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Single, Daily Oral Doses of SYN-010 Compared to Placebo in Adult Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation), which is not on this map. Cited by 87 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03763175 phase2terminatednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Single, Daily Oral Doses of SYN-010 Compared to Placebo in Adult Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (EASE-DO)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCedars-Sinai Medical CenterRan2018 to 2020Enrolled59ConditionsIrritable Bowel Syndrome With ConstipationArmsSYN-010 21 mg, SYN-010 42 mg, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 212 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Ileal bile acid transporter inhibitors for chronic constipation in the elderly.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Modern concepts of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2025
    Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David KunkelGI Motility Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8730 Alden Drive, Thalians Building, 2nd Floor East, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Robert J Basseri
Marc D Makhani
Kelly Chong
Christopher Chang
Mark Pimentel
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA growing body of literature suggests an association between methane and constipation. Studies also link degree of methane production to severity of constipation and have shown constipation is improved following antibiotics.

aimsWe aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the cumulative evidence regarding the association between methane and constipation.

methodsA literature search was performed using MEDLINE and Embase to identify studies where the presence (or absence) of methane was assessed in constipated subjects. Search terms included "methane," "breath test," "constipation," "motility," "transit," "irritable bowel syndrome" and/or "IBS." Pooled odds ratios were generated using a random effects model. In a separate analysis, studies that measured intestinal transit in methane and non-methane subjects were systematically reviewed.

resultsNine studies met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Among these, 1,277 subjects were examined by breath testing (N = 319 methane producers and N = 958 methane non-producers). Pooling all studies, a significant association was found between methane on breath test and constipation (OR = 3.51, CI = 2.00-6.16). Among adults only, methane was significantly associated with constipation (OR = 3.47, CI = 1.84-6.54). Similar results were seen when only examining subjects with IBS (OR = 3.60, CI = 1.61-8.06). The systematic review identified eight additional papers which all demonstrated an association between methane and delayed transit.

conclusionsWe demonstrate that methane present on breath testing is significantly associated with constipation in both IBS and functional constipation. These results suggest there may be merit in using breath testing in constipation. Moreover, methane may be used to identify candidates for antibiotic treatment of constipation.

Indexed as

Breath TestsConstipationHumansMethaneMethane

Identifiers

PMID21286935
OpenAlexW2089548492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.