Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21286740›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurology2011

Transcranial magnetic stimulation primes the effects of exercise therapy in multiple sclerosis.

Francesco Mori, Concetta Ljoka, Elisabetta Magni, Claudia Codecà, Hajime Kusayanagi, Fabrizia Monteleone, Andrea Sancesario, Giorgio Bernardi, Giacomo Koch, Calogero Foti and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01786005 (Antispastic Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Cerebral and Spinal Spasticity), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01786005 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Antispastic Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Cerebral and Spinal Spasticity

TypeinterventionalSponsorRussian Academy of Medical SciencesRan2013 to 2015Enrolled60ConditionsSpasticity, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke, TraumaArmsTranscranial magnetic stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Theta-burst stimulation as a therapeutic tool in neurological pathology: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment of limb spasticity following multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Exercise therapy for fatigue in multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Non pharmacological interventions for spasticity in multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Intermittent theta burst stimulation improves spasticity, pain and cognitive functions in progressive multiple sclerosis: a pilot study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Central Neuropathic Pain.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco MoriDipartimento di Neuroscienze, Clinica Neurologica, Università Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Concetta Ljoka
Elisabetta Magni
Claudia Codecà
Hajime Kusayanagi
Fabrizia Monteleone
Andrea Sancesario
Giorgio Bernardi
Giacomo Koch
Calogero Foti
Diego Centonze
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITFondazione Santa Lucia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exercise therapy (ET) can be beneficial in disabled multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Intermittent transcranial magnetic theta burst stimulation (iTBS) induces long-term excitability changes of the cerebral cortex and may ameliorate spasticity in MS. We investigated whether the combination of iTBS and a program of ET can improve motor disability in MS patients. In a double-blind, sham-controlled trial, 30 participants were randomized to three different interventions: iTBS plus ET, sham stimulation plus ET, and iTBS alone. Before and after 2 weeks of treatment, measures of spasticity through the modified Ashworth scale (MAS) and the 88 items Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Score questionnaire (MSSS-88), fatigue through the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), daily living activities (ADL) through the Barthel index and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) through the 54 items Multiple Sclerosis Quality of life inventory (MSQoL-54) were collected. iTBS plus ET reduced MAS, MSSS-88, FSS scores, while in the Barthel index and MSQoL-54, physical composite scores were increased. iTBS alone caused a reduction of the MAS score, while none of the measured scales showed significant changes after sham iTBS plus ET. iTBS associated with ET is a promising tool for motor rehabilitation of MS patients.

Indexed as

AdultDisability EvaluationDouble-Blind MethodEvoked Potentials, MotorExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisRange of Motion, ArticularSeverity of Illness IndexStatistics, NonparametricTime FactorsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID21286740
OpenAlexW1982233133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.