ReviewDer Radiologe2011
[Value of CT and MR angiography for diagnostics of intracranial aneurysms].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Cerebrovascular diagnostics: imaging].Der Radiologe · 2012Article
- Monitoring peri-therapeutic cerebral circulation time: a feasibility study using color-coded quantitative DSA in patients with steno-occlusive arterial disease.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2012Article
- Can we evaluate cranial aneurysms on conventional brain magnetic resonance imaging?Journal of neurosciences in rural practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is still considered the gold standard in neurovascular imaging. However, due to permanent progress in the field of cross-sectional imaging modalities many questions can be answered with these less invasive methods. The following article gives an overview of the principles of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and demonstrates the growing importance in the diagnosis and follow-up of intracranial aneurysms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21286679What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.