ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2011
Maintenance of Certification, maintenance of public trust.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient and public involvement in medical performance processes: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Pooled it
- Article
- National programmes for validating physician competence and fitness for practice: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2016Article
- Lifelong Learning for the Hand Surgeon.The Journal of hand surgery · 2015Review
- Certification examination cases of candidates for certification by the American Board of Plastic Surgery: trends in practice profiles spanning a decade (2000 to 2009).Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2011Article
- Adherence to practice guidelines based on American Board of Plastic Surgery Maintenance of Certification data.Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Maintenance of Certification program has been well received by many physicians but has faced significant opposition from others who complain that it is overly tedious, costly, and irrelevant to their practice. This article offers a consolidated and concise history of the program and a summary of what plastic surgeons need to know to successfully complete the American Board of Plastic Surgery's own Maintenance of Certification requirements. The authors have justified each step of the board's Maintenance of Certification process in terms of how it improves the quality of care delivered to plastic surgery patients. Finally, a summary of research is presented that demonstrates both that the public supports the maintenance of certification process for all physicians and that continuing education and formal assessment and improvement initiatives have been linked in multiple studies to a better and more evidence-based medical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.