Trial reportBMC cancer2011
A randomised trial of a psychosocial intervention for cancer patients integrated into routine care: the PROMPT study (promoting optimal outcomes in mood through tailored psychosocial therapies).
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anxiety in patients with cancer and emergency department use: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Is care really shared? A systematic review of collaborative care (shared care) interventions for adult cancer patients with depression.BMC health services research · 2019Pooled it
- Reduced patient anxiety as a result of radiation therapist-led psychosocial support: a systematic review.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2017Pooled it
- Stepped wedge randomised controlled trials: systematic review of studies published between 2010 and 2014.Trials · 2015Pooled it
- Effectiveness of a Psychosocial Care Quality Improvement Strategy to Address Quality of Life in Patients With Cancer: The HuCare2 Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.JAMA network open · 2021Trial
- Enhancing coping skills for persons with cancer utilizing mastery enhancement: a pilot randomized clinical trial.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2019Trial
- Trial
- A tiered multidisciplinary approach to the psychosocial care of adult cancer patients integrated into routine care: the PROMPT study (a cluster-randomised controlled trial).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017Trial
- Integral strategy to supportive care in breast cancer survivors through occupational therapy and a m-health system: design of a randomized clinical trial.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016Trial
- The benefits of psychosocial interventions for cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2013Trial
- Randomized controlled trial to test a computerized psychosocial cancer assessment and referral program: methods and research design.Contemporary clinical trials · 2013Trial
- Socio-psychological distress, violence, and food insecurity in women undergoing gynecological examinations: insights from a cross-sectional study of an Italian Tertiary Clinic.AJOG global reports · 2025Article
- Quality-of-life among women with breast cancer: application of the international classification of functioning, disability and health model.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Article
- How do radiation therapists detect and manage patients experiencing anxiety in the radiation oncology setting? A vignette study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- Gaps in the Management of Depression Symptoms Following Cancer Diagnosis: A Population-Based Analysis of Prospective Patient-Reported Outcomes.The oncologist · 2020Article
- Development and pilot of an international survey: 'Radiation Therapists and Psychosocial Support'.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2018Article
- The Clinical Utility of Next Generation Sequencing Results in a Community-Based Hereditary Cancer Risk Program.Journal of genetic counseling · 2017Article
- Stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: a review of the statistical methodology used and available.BMC medical research methodology · 2016Review
- Unmet supportive care needs and desire for assistance in patients receiving radiation treatment: Implications for oncology nursing.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite evidence that up to 35% of patients with cancer experience significant distress, access to effective psychosocial care is limited by lack of systematic approaches to assessment, a paucity of psychosocial services, and patient reluctance to accept treatment either because of perceived stigma or difficulties with access to specialist psycho-oncology services due to isolation or disease burden. This paper presents an overview of a randomised study to evaluate the effectiveness of a brief tailored psychosocial Intervention delivered by health professionals in cancer care who undergo focused training and participate in clinical supervision. METHODS/
designHealth professionals from the disciplines of nursing, occupational therapy, speech pathology, dietetics, physiotherapy or radiation therapy will participate in training to deliver the psychosocial Intervention focusing on core concepts of supportive-expressive, cognitive and dignity-conserving care. Health professional training will consist of completion of a self-directed manual and participation in a skills development session. Participating health professionals will be supported through structured clinical supervision whilst delivering the Intervention. In the stepped wedge design each of the 5 participating clinical sites will be allocated in random order from Control condition to Training then delivery of the Intervention. A total of 600 patients will be recruited across all sites. Based on level of distress or risk factors eligible patients will receive up to 4 sessions, each of up to 30 minutes in length, delivered face-to-face or by telephone. Participants will be assessed at baseline and 10-week follow-up. Patient outcome measures include anxiety and depression, quality of life, unmet psychological and supportive care needs. Health professional measures include psychological morbidity, stress and burnout. Process evaluation will be conducted to assess perceptions of participation in the study and the factors that may promote translation of learning into practice. DISCUSSION: This study will provide important information about the effectiveness of a brief tailored psychological Intervention for patients with cancer and the potential to prevent development of significant distress in patients considered at risk. It will yield data about the feasibility of this model of care in routine clinical practice and identify enablers and barriers to its systematic implementation in cancer settings.
trial registrationACTRN12610000448044.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.