Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21284835›Full record

ArticleInvestigative genetics2011

Phred-Phrap package to analyses tools: a pipeline to facilitate population genetics re-sequencing studies.

Moara Machado, Wagner Cs Magalhães, Allan Sene, Bruno Araújo, Alessandra C Faria-Campos, Stephen J Chanock, Leandro Scott, Guilherme Oliveira, Eduardo Tarazona-Santos, Maira R Rodrigues

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. First detection of Trypanosoma vivax in small ruminants in the state of Bahia.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Moara Machado *Departamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av Antonio Carlos 6627, Pampulha, Caixa Postal 486, Belo Horizonte, MG, CEP 31270-910, Brazil.
Wagner Cs Magalhães *Departamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av Antonio Carlos 6627, Pampulha, Caixa Postal 486, Belo Horizonte, MG, CEP 31270-910, Brazil.
Allan SeneDepartamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av Antonio Carlos 6627, Pampulha, Caixa Postal 486, Belo Horizonte, MG, CEP 31270-910, Brazil.
Bruno AraújoDepartamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av Antonio Carlos 6627, Pampulha, Caixa Postal 486, Belo Horizonte, MG, CEP 31270-910, Brazil.
Alessandra C Faria-CamposDepartamento de Ciência da Computação, Instituto de Ciências Exatas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av Antonio Carlos 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, CEP 31270-910, Brazil.
Stephen J ChanockLaboratory of Translational Genomics of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Leandro ScottGenomics and Computational Biology Group and Center for Excellence in Bioinformatics, René Rachou Institute, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av Augusto de Lima 1715, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30190-002, Brazil.
Guilherme OliveiraGenomics and Computational Biology Group and Center for Excellence in Bioinformatics, René Rachou Institute, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av Augusto de Lima 1715, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30190-002, Brazil.
Eduardo Tarazona-SantosDepartamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av Antonio Carlos 6627, Pampulha, Caixa Postal 486, Belo Horizonte, MG, CEP 31270-910, Brazil.
Maira R RodriguesDepartamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av Antonio Carlos 6627, Pampulha, Caixa Postal 486, Belo Horizonte, MG, CEP 31270-910, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Laboratory of Translational GenomicsZIACP010201 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI PROKUNINA-OLSSON, LIUDMILA · 2010 to 2025
$91.2M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTargeted re-sequencing is one of the most powerful and widely used strategies for population genetics studies because it allows an unbiased screening for variation that is suitable for a wide variety of organisms. Examples of studies that require re-sequencing data are evolutionary inferences, epidemiological studies designed to capture rare polymorphisms responsible for complex traits and screenings for mutations in families and small populations with high incidences of specific genetic diseases. Despite the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, Sanger sequencing is still the most popular approach in population genetics studies because of the widespread availability of automatic sequencers based on capillary electrophoresis and because it is still less prone to sequencing errors, which is critical in population genetics studies. Two popular software applications for re-sequencing studies are Phred-Phrap-Consed-Polyphred, which performs base calling, alignment, graphical edition and genotype calling and DNAsp, which performs a set of population genetics analyses. These independent tools are the start and end points of basic analyses. In between the use of these tools, there is a set of basic but error-prone tasks to be performed with re-sequencing data.

resultsIn order to assist with these intermediate tasks, we developed a pipeline that facilitates data handling typical of re-sequencing studies. Our pipeline: (1) consolidates different outputs produced by distinct Phred-Phrap-Consed contigs sharing a reference sequence; (2) checks for genotyping inconsistencies; (3) reformats genotyping data produced by Polyphred into a matrix of genotypes with individuals as rows and segregating sites as columns; (4) prepares input files for haplotype inferences using the popular software PHASE; and (5) handles PHASE output files that contain only polymorphic sites to reconstruct the inferred haplotypes including polymorphic and monomorphic sites as required by population genetics software for re-sequencing data such as DNAsp.

conclusionWe tested the pipeline in re-sequencing studies of haploid and diploid data in humans, plants, animals and microorganisms and observed that it allowed a substantial decrease in the time required for sequencing analyses, as well as being a more controlled process that eliminates several classes of error that may occur when handling datasets. The pipeline is also useful for investigators using other tools for sequencing and population genetics analyses.

Identifiers

PMID21284835
PMCPMC3041995
OpenAlexW2131701606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.