Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21284373›Full record

ArticleGenome research2011

Nucleotide composition-linked divergence of vertebrate core promoter architecture.

Simon J van Heeringen, Waseem Akhtar, Ulrike G Jacobi, Robert C Akkers, Yutaka Suzuki, Gert Jan C Veenstra

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Genomics Methods forCold Spring Harbor protocols · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Establishing pluripotency in early development.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The epigenome in early vertebrate development.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2012
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Simon J van HeeringenRadboud University Nijmegen, Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Waseem Akhtar
Ulrike G Jacobi
Robert C Akkers
Yutaka Suzuki
Gert Jan C Veenstra
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

Interrogating the Xenopus tropicalis genome using tile path microarraysR01HD054356 · NICHD · STICHTING RADBOUD UNIVERSITEIT · PI VEENSTRA, GERT JAN C. · 2007 to 2011
$1.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD054356NICHD NIH HHS R01HD054356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription initiation involves the recruitment of basal transcription factors to the core promoter. A variety of core promoter elements exists; however for most of these motifs, the distribution across species is unknown. Here we report on the comparison of human and amphibian promoter sequences. We have used oligo-capping in combination with deep sequencing to determine transcription start sites in Xenopus tropicalis. To systematically predict regulatory elements, we have developed a de novo motif finding pipeline using an ensemble of computational tools. A comprehensive comparison of human and amphibian promoter sequences revealed both similarities and differences in core promoter architecture. Some of the differences stem from a highly divergent nucleotide composition of Xenopus and human promoters. Whereas the distribution of some core promoter motifs is conserved independently of species-specific nucleotide bias, the frequency of another class of motifs correlates with the single nucleotide frequencies. This class includes the well-known TATA box and SP1 motifs, which are more abundant in Xenopus and human promoters, respectively. While these motifs are enriched above the local nucleotide background in both organisms, their frequency varies in step with this background. These differences are likely adaptive as these motifs can recruit TFIID to either CpG island or sharply initiating promoters. Our results highlight both the conserved and diverged aspects of vertebrate transcription, most notably showing co-opted motif usage to recruit the transcriptional machinery to promoters with diverging nucleotide composition. This shows how sweeping changes in nucleotide composition are compatible with highly conserved mechanisms of transcription initiation.

Indexed as

Conserved SequenceTranscription, GeneticAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsBase SequenceCpG IslandsFemaleGenetic VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMolecular Sequence DataOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidTATA BoxTranscription Factor TFIIDTranscription Factor TFIID

Identifiers

PMID21284373
PMCPMC3044855
OpenAlexW2155244199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.