ArticlePLoS computational biology2011
Is my network module preserved and reproducible?
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 648 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
648 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,066 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mismatch repair protein deficiency and its implications on distant metastasis in colorectal cancer: A comprehensive analysis.Cancer medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Brain DNA methylomic analysis of frontotemporal lobar degeneration reveals OTUD4 in shared dysregulated signatures across pathological subtypes.Acta neuropathologica · 2023Pooled it
- Caloric restriction improves glycemic control via the adiponectin-ceramide axis in non-obese men and women: the CALERIE™ 2 randomized controlled trial.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Mepolizumab alters gene regulatory networks of nasal airway type-2 and epithelial inflammation in urban children with asthma.Nature communications · 2025Trial
- Multi-Network Co-expression Analysis Enhances Biological Insights from Single-Cell Gene Expression.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026Article
- Predicting and finding geroprotective compounds through modulating conserved longevity-associated aging modules.Science advances · 2026Article
- Early oligodendrocyte dysfunction signature in Alzheimer's disease: Insights from DNA methylomics and transcriptomics.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Cell-based polygenic risk scores predict clinical progression and prioritize network-based therapeutic targets in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Multi-Layer Transcriptomic Comparison Across Human, Pig, and Mouse Informs Tissue- and Trait-Specific Animal Model Selection.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Integrated Analysis of Rat Pulmonary Hypertension Datasets Identifies Candidate circRNA Networks in Hypoxia-Exposed Pulmonary Artery Tissue.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Peripheral blood transcriptomic signature is associated with cognitive impairment and freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: a data-driven approach.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Co-Expression Network Analyses Reveal Long Non-Coding RNA Programs Associated with Trophoblast Development and Response to Zika Virus Infection in Twins Discordant for Congenital Zika Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling of triple-negative breast cancer uncovers epigenetic biomarkers of tumor identity and the immune microenvironment.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Gene network analysis predicts the primary regulators of ABA-dependent transcriptional activation and repression in Populus roots.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Proteome-Level Autophagy-Lysosome Remodelling Marks Ageing in Human Dermal Fibroblasts and Nominates Hydroxytyrosol as a Candidate Nutraceutical.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Modular PheWAS reveals the therapeutic heterogeneity landscape of Danghong injection on stable angina pectoris.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Article
- Immune-epithelial crosstalk governs immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in colorectal cancer.iScience · 2026Article
- CroCoNet: a framework for the quantitative comparison of gene regulatory networks across species.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Mapping lncRNAs onto multilevel mRNA co‑expression modules in autism.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Conserved leaf-root metabolomic network asymmetry underpins divergent drought strategies.The Plant cell · 2026Article
588 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In many applications, one is interested in determining which of the properties of a network module change across conditions. For example, to validate the existence of a module, it is desirable to show that it is reproducible (or preserved) in an independent test network. Here we study several types of network preservation statistics that do not require a module assignment in the test network. We distinguish network preservation statistics by the type of the underlying network. Some preservation statistics are defined for a general network (defined by an adjacency matrix) while others are only defined for a correlation network (constructed on the basis of pairwise correlations between numeric variables). Our applications show that the correlation structure facilitates the definition of particularly powerful module preservation statistics. We illustrate that evaluating module preservation is in general different from evaluating cluster preservation. We find that it is advantageous to aggregate multiple preservation statistics into summary preservation statistics. We illustrate the use of these methods in six gene co-expression network applications including 1) preservation of cholesterol biosynthesis pathway in mouse tissues, 2) comparison of human and chimpanzee brain networks, 3) preservation of selected KEGG pathways between human and chimpanzee brain networks, 4) sex differences in human cortical networks, 5) sex differences in mouse liver networks. While we find no evidence for sex specific modules in human cortical networks, we find that several human cortical modules are less preserved in chimpanzees. In particular, apoptosis genes are differentially co-expressed between humans and chimpanzees. Our simulation studies and applications show that module preservation statistics are useful for studying differences between the modular structure of networks. Data, R software and accompanying tutorials can be downloaded from the following webpage: http://www.genetics.ucla.edu/labs/horvath/CoexpressionNetwork/ModulePreservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.