Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21283624›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Contributions made by CDC25 phosphatases to proliferation of intestinal epithelial stem and progenitor cells.

Gwanghee Lee, Sofia Origanti, Lynn S White, Jinwu Sun, Thaddeus S Stappenbeck, Helen Piwnica-Worms

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emerging Therapeutic Agents for Colorectal Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. APC/CCurrent biology : CB · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Fasting protects mice from lethal DNA damage by promoting small intestinal epithelial stem cell survival.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. MicroRNAs in Vascular Biology.International journal of vascular medicine · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gwanghee LeeDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Sofia Origanti
Lynn S White
Jinwu Sun
Thaddeus S Stappenbeck
Helen Piwnica-Worms
Washington University in St. Louis · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USImaging Center · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
WU-MDACC Inter-Institutional Molecular Imaging CenterP50CA094056 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KOPAN, RAPHAEL · 2002 to 2016
$26.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS P30 CA91842NCI NIH HHS P50 CA094056NCI NIH HHS P50 CA94056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CDC25 protein phosphatases drive cell cycle advancement by activating cyclin-dependent protein kinases (CDKs). Humans and mice encode three family members denoted CDC25A, -B and -C and genes encoding these family members can be disrupted individually with minimal phenotypic consequences in adult mice. However, adult mice globally deleted for all three phosphatases die within one week after Cdc25 disruption. A severe loss of absorptive villi due to a failure of crypt epithelial cells to proliferate was observed in the small intestines of these mice. Because the Cdc25s were globally deleted, the small intestinal phenotype and loss of animal viability could not be solely attributed to an intrinsic defect in the inability of small intestinal stem and progenitor cells to divide. Here, we report the consequences of deleting different combinations of Cdc25s specifically in intestinal epithelial cells. The phenotypes arising in these mice were then compared with those arising in mice globally deleted for the Cdc25s and in mice treated with irinotecan, a chemotherapeutic agent commonly used to treat colorectal cancer. We report that the phenotypes arising in mice globally deleted for the Cdc25s are due to the failure of small intestinal stem and progenitor cells to proliferate and that blocking cell division by inhibiting the cell cycle engine (through Cdc25 loss) versus by inducing DNA damage (via irinotecan) provokes a markedly different response of small intestinal epithelial cells. Finally, we demonstrate that CDC25A and CDC25B but not CDC25C compensate for each other to maintain the proliferative capacity of intestinal epithelial stem and progenitor cells.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationAnimalscdc25 PhosphatasesEpithelial CellsGene DeletionIntestine, SmallMiceMice, KnockoutStem CellsCdc25a protein, mouseCdc25b protein, mouseCdc25c protein, mousecdc25 Phosphatases

Identifiers

PMID21283624
PMCPMC3026785
OpenAlexW2014731766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.