Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21282665›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011

The genome of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta.

Yannick Wurm, John Wang, Oksana Riba-Grognuz, Miguel Corona, Sanne Nygaard, Brendan G Hunt, Krista K Ingram, Laurent Falquet, Mingkwan Nipitwattanaphon, Dietrich Gotzek and 28 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 173 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
25.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 365 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. TheInsects · 2024
    Article
  13. Phenomenon of reproductive plasticity in ants.Current opinion in insect science · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pest categorisation ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  19. Tracking Adaptive Pathways of Invasive Insects: Novel Insight from Genomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Genome-Wide Analysis of the Odorant Receptor Gene Family inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors at 14 institutions in 7 countries.

Yannick WurmDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. yannick.wurm@unil.ch
John Wang
Oksana Riba-Grognuz
Miguel Corona
Sanne Nygaard
Brendan G Hunt
Krista K Ingram
Laurent Falquet
Mingkwan Nipitwattanaphon
Dietrich Gotzek
Michiel B Dijkstra
Jan Oettler
Fabien Comtesse
Cheng-Jen Shih
Wen-Jer Wu
Chin-Cheng Yang
Jerome Thomas
Emmanuel Beaudoing
Sylvain Pradervand
Volker Flegel
Erin D Cook
Roberto Fabbretti
Heinz Stockinger
Li Long
William G Farmerie
Jane Oakey
Jacobus J Boomsma
Pekka Pamilo
Soojin V Yi
Jürgen Heinze
Michael A D Goodisman
Laurent Farinelli
Keith Harshman
Nicolas Hulo
Lorenzo Cerutti
Ioannis Xenarios
Dewayne Shoemaker
Laurent Keller
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CHGeorgia Institute of Technology · USNational Taiwan University · TWUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Regensburg · DEAgricultural Research Service · USBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica · TWColgate University · USCSIRO Health and Biosecurity · AUL.A.C. (Switzerland) · CHSmithsonian Institution · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ants have evolved very complex societies and are key ecosystem members. Some ants, such as the fire ant Solenopsis invicta, are also major pests. Here, we present a draft genome of S. invicta, assembled from Roche 454 and Illumina sequencing reads obtained from a focal haploid male and his brothers. We used comparative genomic methods to obtain insight into the unique features of the S. invicta genome. For example, we found that this genome harbors four adjacent copies of vitellogenin. A phylogenetic analysis revealed that an ancestral vitellogenin gene first underwent a duplication that was followed by possibly independent duplications of each of the daughter vitellogenins. The vitellogenin genes have undergone subfunctionalization with queen- and worker-specific expression, possibly reflecting differential selection acting on the queen and worker castes. Additionally, we identified more than 400 putative olfactory receptors of which at least 297 are intact. This represents the largest repertoire reported so far in insects. S. invicta also harbors an expansion of a specific family of lipid-processing genes, two putative orthologs to the transformer/feminizer sex differentiation gene, a functional DNA methylation system, and a single putative telomerase ortholog. EST data indicate that this S. invicta telomerase ortholog has at least four spliceforms that differ in their use of two sets of mutually exclusive exons. Some of these and other unique aspects of the fire ant genome are likely linked to the complex social behavior of this species.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyAnimalsAntsBase SequenceComputational BiologyDNA MethylationExpressed Sequence TagsGenome, InsectGenomicsHierarchy, SocialMaleMolecular Sequence DataReceptors, OdorantSequence Analysis, DNAVitellogeninsReceptors, OdorantVitellogenins

Identifiers

PMID21282665
PMCPMC3078418
OpenAlexW2005607933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.