Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21282457›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2011

Multilaboratory testing of two-drug combinations of antifungals against Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, and Candida parapsilosis.

Vishnu Chaturvedi, Rama Ramani, David Andes, Daniel J Diekema, Michael A Pfaller, Mahmoud A Ghannoum, Cindy Knapp, Shawn R Lockhart, Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner, Thomas J Walsh and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Current medical mycology · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Characteristics of antifungal utilization for hospitalized children in the United States.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2022
    Article
  11. Role of Antifungal Combinations in Difficult to TreatJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Chemogenomic Profiling of the Fungal Pathogen Candida albicans.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Review
  17. Combination Antifungal Therapy: A Review of Current Data.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Vishnu ChaturvediMycology Laboratory, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, 120 New Scotland Ave., Albany, NY 12208, USA. vishnu@wadsworth.org
Rama Ramani
David Andes
Daniel J Diekema
Michael A Pfaller
Mahmoud A Ghannoum
Cindy Knapp
Shawn R Lockhart
Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner
Thomas J Walsh
Karen Marchillo
Shawn Messer
Amanda R Welshenbaugh
Cara Bastulli
Noreen Iqbal
Victor L Paetznick
Jose Rodriguez
Tin Sein
Case Western Reserve University · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USWadsworth Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are few multilaboratory studies of antifungal combination testing to suggest a format for use in clinical laboratories. In the present study, eight laboratories tested quality control (QC) strain Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and clinical isolates Candida albicans 20533.043, C. albicans 20464.007, Candida glabrata 20205.075, and C. parapsilosis 20580.070. The clinical isolates had relatively high azole and echinocandin MICs. A modified CLSI M27-A3 protocol was used, with 96-well custom-made plates containing checkerboard pairwise combinations of amphotericin B (AMB), anidulafungin (AND), caspofungin (CSP), micafungin (MCF), posaconazole (PSC), and voriconazole (VRC). The endpoints were scored visually and on a spectrophotometer or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reader for 50% growth reduction (50% inhibitory concentration [IC(50)]). Combination IC(50)s were used to calculate summation fractional inhibitory concentration indices (FICIs) (ΣFIC) based on the Lowe additivity formula. The results revealed that the IC(50)s of all drug combinations were lower or equal to the IC(50) of individual drugs in the combination. A majority of the ΣFIC values were indifferent (ΣFIC = 0.51 to 2.0), but no antagonism was observed (ΣFIC ≥ 4). Synergistic combinations (ΣFIC ≤ 0.5) were found for AMB-PSC against C. glabrata and for AMB-AND and AMB-CSP against C. parapsilosis by both visual and spectrophotometric readings. Additional synergistic interactions were revealed by either of the two endpoints for AMB-AND, AMB-CSP, AMB-MCF, AMB-PSC, AMB-VRC, AND-PSC, CSP-MCF, and CSP-PSC. The percent agreements among participating laboratories ranged from 37.5% (lowest) for AND-CSP and POS-VOR to 87.5% (highest) for AMB-MCF and AND-CSP. Median ΣFIC values showed a wide dispersion, and interlaboratory agreements were less than 85% in most instances. Additional studies are needed to improve the interlaboratory reproducibility of antifungal combination testing.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAnidulafunginAntifungal AgentsCandidaCandida glabrataCaspofunginDrug CombinationsEchinocandinsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayInhibitory Concentration 50LipopeptidesMicafunginMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazoleAmphotericin BAnidulafunginAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginDrug CombinationsEchinocandinsLipopeptidesMicafunginposaconazolePyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID21282457
PMCPMC3067183
OpenAlexW2019097476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.