Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21282424›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2011

Predicting in vitro antibacterial efficacy across experimental designs with a semimechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model.

Elisabet I Nielsen, Otto Cars, Lena E Friberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elisabet I NielsenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Box 591, SE-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden. elisabet.nielsen@farmbio.uu.se
Otto Cars
Lena E Friberg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have previously described a general semimechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model that successfully characterized the time course of antibacterial effects seen in bacterial cultures when exposed to static concentrations of five antibacterial agents of different classes. In this PKPD model, the total bacterial population was divided into two subpopulations, one growing drug-susceptible population and one resting drug-insensitive population. The drug effect was included as an increase in the killing rate of the drug-susceptible bacteria with a maximum-effect (E(max)) model. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the ability of this PKPD model to describe and predict data from in vitro experiments with dynamic concentration-time profiles. Dynamic time-kill curve experiments were performed by using an in vitro kinetic system, where cultures of Streptococcus pyogenes were exposed to benzylpenicillin, cefuroxime, erythromycin, moxifloxacin, or vancomycin using different starting concentrations (2 and 16 times the MIC) and elimination conditions (human half-life, reduced half-life, and constant concentrations). The PKPD model was applied, and the observations for the static as well as dynamic experiments were compared to model predictions based on parameter estimation using (i) static data, (ii) dynamic data, and (iii) combined static and dynamic data. Differences in experimental settings between static and dynamic experiments did not affect the growth kinetics of the bacteria significantly. With parameter reestimation, the structure of our previously proposed PKPD model could well characterize the bacterial growth and killing kinetics when exposed to dynamic concentrations with different elimination rates of all five investigated antibiotics. Furthermore, the model with parameter estimates based on data from only the static time-kill curve experiments could predict the majority of the time-kill curves from the dynamic experiments reasonably well. Adding data from dynamic experiments in the estimation improved the model fit for cefuroxime and vancomycin, indicating some differences in sensitivity to experimental conditions among the antibiotics studied.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAza CompoundsCefuroximeErythromycinFluoroquinolonesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMoxifloxacinPenicillin GQuinolinesStreptococcus pyogenesVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAza CompoundsCefuroximeErythromycinFluoroquinolonesMoxifloxacinPenicillin GQuinolinesVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID21282424
PMCPMC3067154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.