Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21282362›Full record

ArticleDiabetes2011

Mendelian randomization studies do not support a role for raised circulating triglyceride levels influencing type 2 diabetes, glucose levels, or insulin resistance.

N Maneka G De Silva, Rachel M Freathy, Tom M Palmer, Louise A Donnelly, Jian'an Luan, Tom Gaunt, Claudia Langenberg, Michael N Weedon, Beverley Shields, Beatrice A Knight and 12 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Diminished 25-OH vitamin DJournal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N Maneka G De SilvaGenetics of Complex Traits, Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Rachel M Freathy
Tom M Palmer
Louise A Donnelly
Jian'an Luan
Tom Gaunt
Claudia Langenberg
Michael N Weedon
Beverley Shields
Beatrice A Knight
Kirsten J Ward
Manjinder S Sandhu
Roger M Harbord
Mark I McCarthy
George Davey Smith
Shah Ebrahim
Andrew T Hattersley
Nicholas Wareham
Debbie A Lawlor
Andrew D Morris
Colin N A Palmer
Timothy M Frayling
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationDepartment of HealthIntramural NIH HHSMedical Research Council G0600705Medical Research Council G0600705(78463)Medical Research Council G0601261Medical Research Council G0601625Medical Research Council G0601625(80386)Medical Research Council G0701863Medical Research Council G0801566Medical Research Council MC_U106179471Wellcome Trust 072960Wellcome Trust 083270Wellcome Trust 083270/Z/07/ZWellcome Trust 085541Wellcome Trust 085541/Z/08/ZWellcome Trust GR072960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe causal nature of associations between circulating triglycerides, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes is unclear. We aimed to use Mendelian randomization to test the hypothesis that raised circulating triglyceride levels causally influence the risk of type 2 diabetes and raise normal fasting glucose levels and hepatic insulin resistance. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe tested 10 common genetic variants robustly associated with circulating triglyceride levels against the type 2 diabetes status in 5,637 case and 6,860 control subjects and four continuous outcomes (reflecting glycemia and hepatic insulin resistance) in 8,271 nondiabetic individuals from four studies.

resultsIndividuals carrying greater numbers of triglyceride-raising alleles had increased circulating triglyceride levels (SD 0.59 [95% CI 0.52-0.65] difference between the 20% of individuals with the most alleles and the 20% with the fewest alleles). There was no evidence that the carriers of greater numbers of triglyceride-raising alleles were at increased risk of type 2 diabetes (per weighted allele odds ratio [OR] 0.99 [95% CI 0.97-1.01]; P = 0.26). In nondiabetic individuals, there was no evidence that carriers of greater numbers of triglyceride-raising alleles had increased fasting insulin levels (SD 0.00 per weighted allele [95% CI -0.01 to 0.02]; P = 0.72) or increased fasting glucose levels (0.00 [-0.01 to 0.01]; P = 0.88). Instrumental variable analyses confirmed that genetically raised circulating triglyceride levels were not associated with increased diabetes risk, fasting glucose, or fasting insulin and, for diabetes, showed a trend toward a protective association (OR per 1-SD increase in log(10) triglycerides: 0.61 [95% CI 0.45-0.83]; P = 0.002).

conclusionsGenetically raised circulating triglyceride levels do not increase the risk of type 2 diabetes or raise fasting glucose or fasting insulin levels in nondiabetic individuals. One explanation for our results is that raised circulating triglycerides are predominantly secondary to the diabetes disease process rather than causal.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAgedAllelesBlood GlucoseCase-Control StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGenotypeHumansInsulinInsulin ResistanceMaleMendelian Randomization AnalysisMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideTriglyceridesBlood GlucoseInsulinTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID21282362
PMCPMC3046819
OpenAlexW2142071170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.