Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21282282›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2011

Differential efficacy of three cycles of CMF followed by tamoxifen in patients with ER-positive and ER-negative tumors: long-term follow up on IBCSG Trial IX.

S Aebi, Z Sun, D Braun, K N Price, M Castiglione-Gertsch, M Rabaglio, R D Gelber, D Crivellari, J Lindtner, R Snyder and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prognosis of medullary breast cancer: analysis of 13 International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) trials.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Sequential versus concurrent adjuvant chemo-endocrine therapy for HR+ early breast cancer: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. PreCurrent breast cancer reports · 2017
    Review
  13. Differential patterns of recurrence and specific survival between luminal A and luminal B breast cancer according to recent changes in the 2013 St Gallen immunohistochemical classification.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 13 institutions in 7 countries.

S AebiDivision of Medical Oncology, Berne University Hospital and Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer research (SAKK), Berne, Switzerland. Electronic address: stefan.aebi@onkologie.ch.
Z SunIBCSG Statistical Center, Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston.
D BraunIBCSG Statistical Center, Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston.
K N PriceIBCSG Statistical Center and Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Boston, USA.
M Castiglione-GertschMedical Onco-Gynecology Unit, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva.
M RabaglioIBCSG Coordinating Center and Inselspital, Berne, Switzerland.
R D GelberIBCSG Statistical Center, Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
D CrivellariDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Italy.
J LindtnerDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljulbljana, Slovenia.
R SnyderDepartment of Medical Oncology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
P KarlssonDepartment of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
E SimonciniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
B A GustersonIBCSG Pathology Review Office, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
G VialeIBCSG Pathology Office, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
M M ReganIBCSG Statistical Center, Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston.
A S CoatesInternational Breast Cancer Study Group, Berne, Switzerland; School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia.
A GoldhirschDepartment of Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USInternational Breast Cancer Study Group · CHAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITCentro di Riferimento Oncologico · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITFrontier Science & Technology Research Foundation · USGeneva College · USInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana · SISt Vincent's Hospital · AUSwiss Group For Clinical Cancer Research · CHUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

Training Grant in Quantitative Sciences for Cancer ResearchT32CA009337 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI QUACKENBUSH, JOHN, TRIPPA, LORENZO · 1986 to 2025
$12.3M
IBCSG STATISTICAL CENTER--A BREAST CANCER STUDY RESOURCEU24CA075362 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI REGAN, MEREDITH M · 1997 to 2015
$7.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA-75362NCI NIH HHS U24 CA075362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive lymph node-negative breast cancer is being reassessed. PATIENTS AND

methodsAfter stratification by ER status, 1669 postmenopausal patients with operable lymph node-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to three 28-day courses of 'classical' CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy followed by tamoxifen for 57 months (CMF→tamoxifen) or to tamoxifen alone for 5 years.

resultsERs were positive in 81% of tumors. At a median follow-up of 13.1 years, patients with ER-positive breast cancers did not benefit from CMF [13-year disease-free survival (DFS) 64% CMF→tamoxifen, 66% tamoxifen; P = 0.99], whereas CMF substantially improved the prognosis of patients with ER-negative breast cancer (13-year DFS 73% versus 57%, P = 0.001). Similarly, breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) was identical in the ER-positive cohort but significantly improved by chemotherapy in the ER-negative cohort (13-year BCFI 80% versus 63%, P = 0.001). CMF had no influence on second nonbreast malignancies or deaths from other causes.

conclusionCMF is not beneficial in postmenopausal patients with node-negative ER-positive breast cancer but is highly effective within the ER-negative cohort. In the future, other markers of chemotherapy response may define a subset of patients with ER-positive tumors who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCyclophosphamideDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFluorouracilFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMethotrexateMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesReceptors, EstrogenTamoxifenCyclophosphamideFluorouracilMethotrexateReceptors, EstrogenTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID21282282
PMCPMC3202167
OpenAlexW2140364514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.