ArticleBiophysical journal2011
Accounting for protein-solvent contacts facilitates design of nonaggregating lattice proteins.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- PatchProt: hydrophobic patch prediction using protein foundation models.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- How sticky are our proteins? Quantifying hydrophobicity of the human proteome.Bioinformatics advances · 2022Article
- Amyloid Oligomers: A Joint Experimental/Computational Perspective on Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinson's Disease, Type II Diabetes, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Chemical reviews · 2021Review
- The hydrophobic effect characterises the thermodynamic signature of amyloid fibril growth.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- The functional roles of the unstructured N- and C-terminal regions in αB-crystallin and other mammalian small heat-shock proteins.Cell stress & chaperones · 2017Article
- The hydrophobic temperature dependence of amino acids directly calculated from protein structures.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- A simple lattice model that captures protein folding, aggregation and amyloid formation.PloS one · 2014Article
- A coarse-grained approach to protein design: learning from design to understand folding.PloS one · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The folding specificity of proteins can be simulated using simplified structural models and knowledge-based pair-potentials. However, when the same models are used to simulate systems that contain many proteins, large aggregates tend to form. In other words, these models cannot account for the fact that folded, globular proteins are soluble. Here we show that knowledge-based pair-potentials, which include explicitly calculated energy terms between the solvent and each amino acid, enable the simulation of proteins that are much less aggregation-prone in the folded state. Our analysis clarifies why including a solvent term improves the foldability. The aggregation for potentials without water is due to the unrealistically attractive interactions between polar residues, causing artificial clustering. When a water-based potential is used instead, polar residues prefer to interact with water; this leads to designed protein surfaces rich in polar residues and well-defined hydrophobic cores, as observed in real protein structures. We developed a simple knowledge-based method to calculate interactions between the solvent and amino acids. The method provides a starting point for modeling the folding and aggregation of soluble proteins. Analysis of our simple model suggests that inclusion of these solvent terms may also improve off-lattice potentials for protein simulation, design, and structure prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.