Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21281566›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2011

A simplified mass-transfer model for visual pigments in amphibian retinal-cone outer segments.

Paul W Weber, Laurens E Howle, Mark M Murray, Joseph M Corless

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Molecular basis for photoreceptor outer segment architecture.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2016
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul W WeberDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Laurens E HowleDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Center for Nonlinear and Complex Systems, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: laurens.howle@duke.edu.
Mark M MurrayDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland.
Joseph M CorlessDepartments of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When radiolabeled precursors and autoradiography are used to investigate turnover of protein components in photoreceptive cone outer segments (COSs), the labeled components--primarily visual pigment molecules (opsins)--are diffusely distributed along the COS. To further assess this COS labeling pattern, we derive a simplified mass-transfer model for quantifying the contributions of advective and diffusive mechanisms to the distribution of opsins within COSs of the frog retina. Two opsin-containing regions of the COS are evaluated: the core axial array of disks and the plasmalemma. Numerical solutions of the mass-transfer model indicate three distinct stages of system evolution. In the first stage, plasmalemma diffusion is dominant. In the second stage, the plasmalemma density reaches a metastable state and transfer between the plasmalemma and disk region occurs, which is followed by an increase in density that is qualitatively similar for both regions. The final stage consists of both regions slowly evolving to the steady-state solution. Our results indicate that autoradiographic and cognate approaches for tracking labeled opsins in the COS cannot be effective methodologies for assessing new disk formation at the base of the COS.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsAnuraRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal Photoreceptor Cell Outer SegmentRetinal PigmentsSolutionsRetinal PigmentsSolutions

Identifiers

PMID21281566
PMCPMC3030251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.