Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21281486›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2011

Perioperative cancer cell dissemination detected with a real-time RT-PCR assay for EpCAM is not associated with worse prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Gregory Sergeant, Tania Roskams, Jos van Pelt, François Houtmeyers, Raymond Aerts, Baki Topal

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00495924 completednot on this map

Prognostic Relevance of Perioperative Cancer Cell Dissemination and Systemic Immune Suppression in Resectable Ductal Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

TypeobservationalSponsorKU LeuvenRan2006 to 2008Enrolled100ConditionsPancreatic Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma, Neoplasm Circulating Cells, Tumor Markers, BiologicalArmsPancreatic resection (PD)
NCT05400681 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Pre- and Postoperative Incidence and Prognostic Implication of Positive Peritoneal Lavage and Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSonke DetlefsenRan2020 to 2024Enrolled200ConditionsPancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic value of circulating tumor cells in patients with pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gregory SergeantDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Tania Roskams
Jos van Pelt
François Houtmeyers
Raymond Aerts
Baki Topal
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) has been used as surrogate marker for the quantification of circulating tumour cells (CTC). Our aim was to prospectively study the value of a real-time RT-PCR assay for EpCAM detection in the peripheral blood and peritoneal cavity of patients undergoing pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

methodsFrom 48 patients with PDAC (40 resectable, 8 unresectable) and 10 patients with chronic pancreatitis undergoing pancreatectomy 10 ml of venous blood was drawn preoperatively (PB) and postoperatively (POB, day 1 (D1B), day 7 (D7B) and after 6 weeks (6WB). Of all patients undergoing pancreatectomy, 40 ml peritoneal lavage fluid was taken preoperatively and postoperatively. A real-time RT-PCR assay (TaqMan, ABI Prism 7700) was developed for the detection of EpCAM mRNA. To discriminate between EpCAM-positive and negative samples a cut-off was applied. Median postoperative follow-up was 24.0 months (range: 0.7-41.3).

resultsPB was EpCAM-positive+ in 25% of patients versus 65% of patients in POB (p < 0.0001). EpCAM+ was noted at D1B, D7B and 6WB was found in 28.6%, 23.1% and 23.5% of patients respectively. Preoperative peritoneal lavage fluid was EpCAM+ in 10.3% versus 53.8% of patients postoperatively (p < 0.0001). At none of the time-points, an association was found between EpCAM positivity in blood and/or peritoneal cavity and cancer-specific or disease-free survival. Also, no significant associations were found between clinicopathological variables and perioperative EpCAM positivity.

conclusionsDespite a significant increase in EpCAM counts in postoperative blood and peritoneal lavage fluid this was not associated with worse prognosis after pancreatectomy for PDAC.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00495924.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedAntigens, NeoplasmAscitic FluidBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCell Adhesion MoleculesComputer SystemsEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCell Adhesion MoleculesEPCAM protein, humanEpithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule

Identifiers

PMID21281486
PMCPMC3045357
OpenAlexW2074687081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.