Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21280125›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2011

Calorimetric study of a series of designed repeat proteins: modular structure and modular folding.

Aitziber L Cortajarena, Lynne Regan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ambidextrous helical nanotubes from self-assembly of designed helical hairpin motifs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aitziber L CortajarenaDepartment of Molecular Biophysics & Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. aitziber.lopezcortajarena@imdea.org
Lynne Regan

Funding

Single-molecule fluorescence studies of protein foldingR01GM080515 · NIGMS · WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE · PI HARAN, GILAD · 2007 to 2010
$992k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080515NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM080515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repeat proteins comprise tandem arrays of a small structural motif. Their structure is defined and stabilized by interactions between residues that are close in the primary sequence. Several studies have investigated whether their structural modularity translates into modular thermodynamic properties. Tetratricopeptide repeat proteins (TPRs) are a class in which the repeated unit is a 34 amino acid helix-turn-helix motif. In this work, we use differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to study the equilibrium stability of a series of TPR proteins with different numbers of an identical consensus repeat, from 2 to 20, CTPRa2 to CTPRa20. The DSC data provides direct evidence that the folding/unfolding transition of CTPR proteins does not fit a two-state folding model. Our results confirm and expand earlier studies on TPR proteins, which showed that apparent two-state unfolding curves are better fit by linear statistical mechanics models: 1D Ising models in which each repeat is treated as an independent folding unit.

Indexed as

Calorimetry, Differential ScanningRepetitive Sequences, Amino AcidConsensus SequenceModels, MolecularProtein DenaturationProtein FoldingProteinsProtein StabilityProtein UnfoldingThermodynamicsProteins

Identifiers

PMID21280125
PMCPMC3048418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.