ArticleBiopolymers2011
Nonadditivity in the alpha-helix to coil transition.
Article in Biopolymers, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implicit water model within the Zimm-Bragg approach to analyze experimental data for heat and cold denaturation of proteins.Communications chemistry · 2021Article
- Thermodynamic stability and flexibility characteristics of antibody fragment complexes.Protein and peptide letters · 2014Article
- Ensemble properties of network rigidity reveal allosteric mechanisms.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Lifson-Roig Model (LRM) and all its variants describe the α-helix to coil transition in terms of additive component-free energies within a free energy decomposition scheme, and these contributions are interpreted through sequence-context dependent nucleation and propagation parameters. Although this phenomenological approach is able to adequately fit experimental data on helix content and heat capacity, the number of required parameters increases dramatically with additional sequence variation. Moreover, due to nonadditive competing microscopic effects that are difficult to disentangle within a LRM, large uncertainties within the parameters emerge. We offer an alternative view that removes the need for sequence-context parameterization by focusing on individual microsopic interactions within a free energy decomposition and explicitly account for nonadditivity in conformational entropy through network rigidity using a Distance Constraint Model (DCM). We apply a LRM and a DCM to previously published experimental heat capacity and helix content data for a series of heterogeneous polypeptides. Both models describe the experimental data well, and the parameters from both models are consistent with prior work. However, the number of DCM parameters is independent of sequence-variability, the parameter values exhibit better transferability, and the helix nucleation is predicted by the DCM explicitly through the nonadditive nature of conformational entropy. The importance of these results is that the DCM offers a system-independent approach for modeling stability within polypeptides and proteins, where the demonstrated accuracy for the α-helix to coil transition over a series of heterogeneous polypeptides described here is one case in point.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.