Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21279493›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2012

Factor structure of decisional balance and temptations scales for smoking: cross-validation in urban female African-American adolescents.

Bettina B Hoeppner, Colleen A Redding, Joseph S Rossi, Unto E Pallonen, James O Prochaska, Wayne F Velicer

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The reliability and validity of the Temptations to Try Smoking Scale in a group of Chinese adolescents.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bettina B HoeppnerCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. bhoeppner@partners.org
Colleen A Redding
Joseph S Rossi
Unto E Pallonen
James O Prochaska
Wayne F Velicer
University of Rhode Island · USJohn Brown University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

ALCOHOL INTERVENTION/TREATMENT OUTCOME RESEARCH TRAININGT32AA007459 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERT MIRANDA, PETER M. MONTI · 1986 to 2026
$13.3M
Optimal TTM Tailoring for Population CessationR01DA023191 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND · PI REDDING, COLLEEN A. · 2008 to 2011
$2.5M
PROMOTING CANCER PREVENTION IN PRIMARY CAREP01CA050087 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND · PI ABRAMS, DAVID BRIAN · 1989 to 1999
–
BREAST CANCER METASTASIS-ASSOCIATED GENESR01CA063045 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI NICOLSON, GARTH L · 1994 to 1996
–
NCI NIH HHS CA50087NCI NIH HHS CA63045NCI NIH HHS P01 CA050087NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007459NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA025511NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transtheoretical model is an influential theoretical model in health psychology, particularly in its application to smoking cessation research. Decisional Balance (DB) and Temptations are key constructs within this framework. PURPOSE: This study examines the psychometric properties of the DB and Temptations scales for smoking in a predominantly African-American sample of urban adolescent girls.

methodsWe used confirmatory factor analysis to compare the fit of previously published factor structures in smokers (n = 233) and nonsmokers (n = 598). External validity was tested by examining stages of change differences in the retained subscales.

resultsResults supported the internal and external validity of the DB scale for smokers and nonsmokers. Notably, previously published three-factor (Social Pros, Coping Pros, Cons) and four-factor (Cons split into "Aesthetic Cons" and "Health Cons") models fit equally well, with Cons subscales correlating highly. For Temptations, a previously published three-factor (Negative Affect, Social, Weight Control) hierarchical model fit well in nonsmokers. In smokers, previously published subscales were reliably measured, but their structural relationship remained unclear. Stage difference tests showed medium to large effect sizes of DB and Temptation subscales in smokers and nonsmokers.

conclusionsThe use of DB was validated for both smokers and nonsmokers in this sample of primarily African-American adolescent females, where Cons can be combined or separated into "Aesthetic Cons" and "Health Cons" based on practical utility and preference. For Temptations, more research is needed but large stage differences in Temptations subscales underscore the importance of this concept in smoking acquisition and cessation.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPsychology, AdolescentSelf EfficacyAdolescentAnalysis of VarianceBlack or African AmericanFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansModels, PsychologicalModels, TheoreticalSmokingUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID21279493
PMCPMC3141098
OpenAlexW2071426504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.