Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21279426›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2011

Occupational rehabilitation policy and practice in the Philippines: initiatives and challenges.

Maria Elizabeth Olavides-Soriano, Enrique Ampo, Reuben Escorpizo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria Elizabeth Olavides-SorianoPublic Administration Program, Graduate School Xavier University-Ateneo de Cagayan, Cagayan de Oro, Philippines.
Enrique Ampo
Reuben Escorpizo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChallenges to occupational rehabilitation or work integration or reintegration which include the socio-political system, poor labour infrastructure, legislation implementation and monitoring limit work participation of an estimated eight million Filipinos with disabilities. This paper aims to present government-level initiatives and ongoing challenges of occupational rehabilitation as a field of practice and research in the Philippines.

methodsWe performed a review of occupational rehabilitation literature relevant to the Philippines looking at legislation, policies, and practice.

resultsWhile several socio-political mechanisms exists, we found no concrete information on the surveillance or distinction of services and their effectiveness provided under occupational rehabilitation and there was also no systemic reporting of the characteristics of the population (persons with disabilities vs. injured workers) requiring those services--despite the effort of the Philippines in adopting a state policy for the total development of persons with disabilities towards gainful employment.

conclusionsThe dearth of information and literature in occupational rehabilitation is likely related to the scarcity of research in the broader area of occupational safety and health and work disability management in the Philippines. The findings of this study could guide work disability management and address further development of infrastructure in occupational rehabilitation in the Philippines.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthPublic PolicyEmploymentHumansOccupational Health ServicesPersons with DisabilitiesPhilippinesPoliticsRehabilitation, Vocational

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.