Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21279400›Full record

ArticleNeurogenetics2011

New clinical findings in the fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome (FXTAS).

Jorge L Juncos, Joash T Lazarus, Emily Graves-Allen, Lisa Shubeck, Michelle Rusin, Gloria Novak, Deborah Hamilton, Julia Rohr, Stephanie L Sherman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurogenetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Essential tremor-like phenotype in Fragile X carrier women.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Biomarkers of balance and gait deficits inFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The polyG diseases: a new disease entity.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jorge L JuncosDepartment of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30032, USA. jjuncos@emory.edu
Joash T Lazarus
Emily Graves-Allen
Lisa Shubeck
Michelle Rusin
Gloria Novak
Deborah Hamilton
Julia Rohr
Stephanie L Sherman
Emory University · US

Funding

UNDERSTANDING FXTAS AMONG MALES WITH THE FMR1 PREMUTATIONP30HD024064 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ROSENMUND, CHRISTIAN · 1988 to 2013
$29.4M
Genetics Epidemiology of the FMR1 GeneR01HD029909 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SHERMAN, STEPHANIE L. · 1994 to 2009
$6.1M
NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD024064NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD24064NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD029909NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD29909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this paper was to assess the phenotypic variance in patients with the Fragile X-associated Tremor Ataxia Syndrome (FXTAS) and to further elucidate genotype-phenotype correlations in the illness. A second goal was to generate hypotheses regarding symptom progression based on careful histories in our sample that can now be tested in ongoing longitudinal studies. The variability of clinical signs and symptom progression in FXTAS complicates our understanding of its phenotype and presents a series of problems in clinical trial design. Similarly, pre-motor and non-motor symptoms have not been adequately explored to answer outstanding questions regarding genotype-phenotype associations in FXTAS. This was a cross-sectional study of FMR1 premutation carriers from known fragile X syndrome pedigrees. We report on the first 50 subjects who have completed a full neurologic evaluation and a brain MRI. Subjects were selected on the basis of motor symptoms or abnormal results (>1 SD) on a quantitative instrument designed to detect mild tremor and ataxia (CATSYS 1994). A neuropsychological battery included the WAIS-III, COWA, and WCST. Statistical analysis used ANOVA and Fisher's exact test with p < 0.05. All FMR1 premutation carriers were men of mean age 65 ± 7 years. According to the diagnostic criteria of Jacquemont et al. (Am J Hum Genet 72(4):869-878, 2003), 21 subjects met criteria for definite FXTAS, 10 for probable, 9 for possible, and 10 were indeterminate. Duration of motor symptoms was significantly longer in the definitive group (8.6 ± 6) compared to the other groups (p < 0.01). The presentations in 40 subjects, excluding the indeterminate group, included: tremor 24, ataxia 5, memory symptoms 3, parkinsonism 2, and torticollis 1. The data suggest at least two dominant phenotypic presentations: (a) a tremor-dominant subtype in which the onset of ataxia is delayed; (b) a second in which ataxia is the dominant presentation from the outset. In both subtypes, once ataxia emerges it tends to track frontal cognitive changes (p < 0.01). The data support the view that FXTAS is a late-life neurodegenerative disorder with involvement of motor, non-motor, and cognitive systems. The results suggest at least two presentations with tremor- and ataxia-predominant phenotypes. In both, global cognitive decline appears to track ataxia. Prospective longitudinal studies are needed to validate this proposed evolution of FXTAS and its relevance to future clinical trials design.

Indexed as

AgedAtaxiaBrainCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFragile X SyndromeGenetic Association StudiesGenetic HeterogeneityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPhenotypeRadiographyTremor

Identifiers

PMID21279400
PMCPMC3766636
OpenAlexW1997578140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.