Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2011
Combination therapy with diltiazem plus CsA/MMF/Pred or CsA/Aza/Pred triple immunosuppressive regimens for use in clinical kidney transplantation in Northwestern China.
Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antihypertensive treatment for kidney transplant recipients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe effects of diltiazem on 1692 kidney transplant recipients under the immunosuppressive regimen of cyclosporine A (CsA) in combination with either mycophenolate mofetil or azothioprine were assessed. The two treatment groups were compared for blood concentrations of CsA, the extent of acceptable dosage reduction for the maintenance of immunotherapy, potential effects of kidney protection, and promotion of graft function.
methodWe monitored changes of blood concentrations of CsA in the two different patient treatment groups for post-transplant graft function, episodes of acute rejection, and hepatic and renal toxicity in 1640 renal transplant recipients after treatment with diltiazem.
resultsIn patients treated with the triple immunosuppressive regimen consisting of CsA, azothioprine, and prednisolone (Pred), the sub-group of patients receiving the diltiazem treatment saw a significantly reduced CsA dosage in comparison to the non-diltiazem group (control group 1) (P < 0.05), but the blood concentrations of CsA of the diltiazem group were higher than those of control group 1 (P < 0.01). Of the patients treated with CsA, mycophenolate mofetil, and Pred, the sub-group of patients also treated with diltiazem showed similar effects: CsA dosage was reduced (P < 0.01) and the blood concentrations of CsA significantly increased (P < 0.01) in comparison with those of control group 2. In addition, recovery time of graft function decreased to 4.7 ± 1.8 days and 3.9 ± 1.4 days in the two diltiazem treatment groups, respectively (P < 0.05), and the rate of acute rejection decreased to 21 (p < 0.05) and 7.9% (P < 0.01), respectively.
conclusionIn our cohort of renal transplantation patients, co-administration of CsA and diltiazem increased CsA blood concentration, thereby resulting in a reduction in its required dosage treatment, which lightened the patients' economic burden while improving primary and long-term kidney function by promoting the recovery of graft function and decreasing hepatic and renal toxicity. The co-administration of diltiazem may also reduce the rate of acute rejection, especially in patients who also receive the triple immunosuppressive regimen consisting of CsA, mycophenolate mofetil, and Pred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.