Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21278188›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2011

PiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to find candidate genes in biological networks.

Michael Smoot, Keiichiro Ono, Trey Ideker, Steven Maere

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. BASIC PENTACYSTEINE1 regulatesFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael SmootDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Keiichiro Ono
Trey Ideker
Steven Maere
VIB-UGent Center for Plant Systems Biology · BEGhent University · BEUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Cytoscape: A Modeling Platform for Biomolecular NetworksR01GM070743 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2004 to 2016
$5.7M
RESOURCE FOR ANALYSIS, VIZUALIZATION, AND INTEGRATION OF NETWORKS (RAVIN)P41RR031228 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2010 to 2011
$3.0M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR031228NCRR NIH HHS RR031228NIGMS NIH HHS GM070743NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledPiNGO is a tool to screen biological networks for candidate genes, i.e. genes predicted to be involved in a biological process of interest. The user can narrow the search to genes with particular known functions or exclude genes belonging to particular functional classes. PiNGO provides support for a wide range of organisms and Gene Ontology classification schemes, and it can easily be customized for other organisms and functional classifications. PiNGO is implemented as a plugin for Cytoscape, a popular network visualization platform. AVAILABILITY: PiNGO is distributed as an open-source Java package under the GNU General Public License (http://www.gnu.org/), and can be downloaded via the Cytoscape plugin manager. A detailed user guide and tutorial are available on the PiNGO website (http://www.psb.ugent.be/esb/PiNGO.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksSoftwareAlgorithmsComputational BiologyGenes

Identifiers

PMID21278188
PMCPMC3065683
OpenAlexW2130534254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.