Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21278049›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical Internet research2011

Review of extracting information from the Social Web for health personalization.

Luis Fernandez-Luque, Randi Karlsen, Jason Bonander

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical Internet research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Data Work: Meaning-Making in the Era of Data-Rich Medicine.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019
    Article
  7. DisVis: Visualizing Discussion Threads in Online Health Communities.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Online discourse on fibromyalgia: text-mining to identify clinical distinction and patient concerns.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2014
    Article
  11. "Big data" and the electronic health record.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2014
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Identifying medical terms in patient-authored text: a crowdsourcing-based approach.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luis Fernandez-LuqueNorthern Research Institute, Tromsø, Norway. luis.luque@norut.no
Randi Karlsen
Jason Bonander

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years the Web has come into its own as a social platform where health consumers are actively creating and consuming Web content. Moreover, as the Web matures, consumers are gaining access to personalized applications adapted to their health needs and interests. The creation of personalized Web applications relies on extracted information about the users and the content to personalize. The Social Web itself provides many sources of information that can be used to extract information for personalization apart from traditional Web forms and questionnaires. This paper provides a review of different approaches for extracting information from the Social Web for health personalization. We reviewed research literature across different fields addressing the disclosure of health information in the Social Web, techniques to extract that information, and examples of personalized health applications. In addition, the paper includes a discussion of technical and socioethical challenges related to the extraction of information for health personalization.

Indexed as

Health CommunicationHealth EducationInformation Storage and RetrievalInternetMedical InformaticsSocial SupportCommunity NetworksData MiningElectronic Health RecordsHumansNatural Language ProcessingOnline Systems

Identifiers

PMID21278049
PMCPMC3221336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.