Understanding the pathophysiology of schizophrenia: are we on the wrong or on the right track?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A Refined Approach to Isolate Interneurons for High-Validity Epigenetic Studies in Human Brain Tissue.Methods and protocols · 2025
   Article
2. False data, positive results in neurobiology: moving beyond the epigenetics of blood and saliva samples in mental disorders.Journal of negative results in biomedicine · 2016
   Review
3. From Linkage Studies to Epigenetics: What We Know and What We Need to Know in the Neurobiology of Schizophrenia.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016
   Review
4. Rethinking Schizophrenia in the Context of the Person and Their Circumstances: Seven Reasons.Frontiers in psychology · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Schizophrenia, "Just the Facts" 6. Moving ahead with the schizophrenia concept: from the elephant to the mouse.2011

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as