ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2011
T cell state transition produces an emergent change detector.
Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunological Paradigms, Mechanisms, and Models: Conceptual Understanding Is a Prerequisite to Effective Modeling.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- A shadow detector for photosynthesis efficiency.Journal of theoretical biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We model the stages of a T cell response from initial activation to T cell expansion and contraction using a system of ordinary differential equations. Results of this modeling suggest that state transitions enable the T cell population to detect change and respond effectively to changes in antigen stimulation levels, rather than simply the presence or absence of antigen. A key component of the system that gives rise to this emergent change detector is initial activation of naïve T cells. The activation step creates a barrier that separates the long-term, slow dynamics of naïve T cells from the short-term, fast dynamics of effector T cells. This separation allows the T cell population to compare current, up-to-date changes in antigen levels to long-term, steady state levels. As a result, the T cell population responds very effectively to sudden shifts in antigen levels, even if the antigen were already present prior to the change. This feature provides a mechanism for T cells to react to rapidly expanding sources of antigen stimulation, such as viruses, while maintaining tolerance to constant or slowly fluctuating sources of stimulation, such as healthy tissue during growth. In addition to modeling T cell activation, we also formulate a model of the proliferation of effector T cells in response to the consumption of positive growth signal, secreted throughout the T cell response. We discuss how the interaction between T cells and growth signal generates an emergent threshold detector that responds preferentially to large changes in antigen stimulation while ignoring small ones. As a final step, we discuss how the de novo generation of adaptive regulatory T cells during the latter phase of the T cell response creates a negative feedback loop that controls the duration and magnitude of the T cell response. Hence, the immune network continually adjusts to a shifting baseline of (self and non-self) antigens, and responds primarily to abrupt changes in these antigens rather than merely their presence or absence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.