Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21276340›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2011

Primary excision of cutaneous melanoma: does the location of excision matter.

Peter Murchie, Erika Sinclair, Amanda J Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of rurality on processes and outcomes in melanoma care: results from a whole-Scotland melanoma cohort in primary and secondary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  5. Safety of community-based minor surgery performed by GPs: an audit in different settings.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Skin cancer excision performance in Scottish primary and secondary care: a retrospective analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Mortality and morbidity after initial diagnostic excision biopsy of cutaneous melanoma in primary versus secondary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Observational
  10. Primary excision of cutaneous melanoma.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Article
  11. Primary excision of cutaneous melanoma.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Article
  12. Primary excision of cutaneous melanoma.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Article
  13. Primary excision of cutaneous melanoma.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Article
  14. To excise or not to excise? Should GPs remove possible melanomas?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Article
  15. Scar orientation: Principles in plastic surgery.Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter MurchieCentre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. p.murchie@abdn.ac.uk
Erika Sinclair
Amanda J Lee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma is diagnosed more quickly if primarily excised in primary care, but current guidelines discourage this. The reports of all melanomas excised in north-east Scotland between 1991 and 2007 were analysed for adequacy of excision. Reports were analysed blinded as to source. Of primary biopsies performed in primary care, 72.5% were reported as completely excised, compared with 69.7% of those performed in secondary care (P<0.612). The difference remained non-significant following adjustment for important confounders.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresBiopsyFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansMaleMelanomaMinor Surgical ProceduresReferral and ConsultationSkin Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID21276340
PMCPMC3026152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.