ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2011
Primary excision of cutaneous melanoma: does the location of excision matter.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can Dermoscopy Be Used to Predict if a Melanoma Is In Situ or Invasive?Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2021Article
- Incomplete Excisions of Melanocytic Lesions: Rates and Risk Factors.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2021Article
- Minor surgery in general practice in Ireland- a report of workload and safety.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- Impact of rurality on processes and outcomes in melanoma care: results from a whole-Scotland melanoma cohort in primary and secondary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018Article
- Safety of community-based minor surgery performed by GPs: an audit in different settings.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016Article
- Melanoma in primary care. The role of the general practitioner.Irish journal of medical science · 2014Article
- Skin cancer excision performance in Scottish primary and secondary care: a retrospective analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014Observational
- Skin lesions suspected of malignancy: an increasing burden on general practice.BMC family practice · 2014Article
- Mortality and morbidity after initial diagnostic excision biopsy of cutaneous melanoma in primary versus secondary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013Observational
- Primary excision of cutaneous melanoma.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011Article
- Primary excision of cutaneous melanoma.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011Article
- Primary excision of cutaneous melanoma.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011Article
- Primary excision of cutaneous melanoma.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011Article
- To excise or not to excise? Should GPs remove possible melanomas?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011Article
- Scar orientation: Principles in plastic surgery.Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Melanoma is diagnosed more quickly if primarily excised in primary care, but current guidelines discourage this. The reports of all melanomas excised in north-east Scotland between 1991 and 2007 were analysed for adequacy of excision. Reports were analysed blinded as to source. Of primary biopsies performed in primary care, 72.5% were reported as completely excised, compared with 69.7% of those performed in secondary care (P<0.612). The difference remained non-significant following adjustment for important confounders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.