Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21276147›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied microbiology2011

An international trial of quantitative PCR for monitoring Legionella in artificial water systems.

J V Lee, S Lai, M Exner, J Lenz, V Gaia, S Casati, P Hartemann, C Lück, B Pangon, M L Ricci and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. MitigatingJournal of water and health · 2025
    Article
  3. Interlaboratory comparison of culture- and PCR-based methods forApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. PCR-BasedMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Two-stage surveillance ofSAGE open medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prevalence ofEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2023
    Article
  11. Conceptual model to informFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in environmental science · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Evaluation of an Environmental Transport Medium forInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  18. Comparison of Updated Methods forInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

J V LeeHealth Protection Agency, London, UK Institute for Hygiene and Public Health, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany Istituto Cantonale di Microbiologia, Bellinzona, Switzerland CHU Nancy, Nancy, France Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Technology, Dresden, Germany Unité de Microbiologie-Hygiène, CH Versailles, Versailles, France Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Roma, Italy Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Pall GeneSystems, Bruz, France.
S Lai
M Exner
J Lenz
V Gaia
S Casati
P Hartemann
C Lück
B Pangon
M L Ricci
M Scaturro
S Fontana
M Sabria
I Sánchez
S Assaf
S Surman-Lee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo perform an international trial to derive alert and action levels for the use of quantitative PCR (qPCR) in the monitoring of Legionella to determine the effectiveness of control measures against legionellae. METHODS AND

resultsLaboratories (7) participated from six countries. Legionellae were determined by culture and qPCR methods with comparable detection limits. Systems were monitored over ≥10 weeks. For cooling towers (232 samples), there was a significant difference between the log mean difference between qPCR (GU l(-1) ) and culture (CFU l(-1) ) for Legionella pneumophila (0·71) and for Legionella spp. (2·03). In hot and cold water (506 samples), the differences were less, 0·62 for Leg. pneumophila and 1·05 for Legionella spp. Results for individual systems depended on the nature of the system and its treatment. In cooling towers, Legionella spp. GU l(-1) always exceeded CFU l(-1) , and usually Legionella spp. were detected by qPCR when absent by culture. The pattern of results by qPCR for Leg. pneumophila followed the culture trend. In hot and cold water, culture and qPCR gave similar results, particularly for Leg. pneumophila. There were some marked exceptions with temperatures ≥50°C, or in the presence of supplementary biocides. Action and alert levels for qPCR were derived that gave results comparable to the application of the European Guidelines based on culture. Algorithms are proposed for the use of qPCR for routine monitoring.

conclusionsAction and alert levels for qPCR can be adjusted to ensure public health is protected with the benefit that remedial actions can be validated earlier with only a small increase in the frequency of action being required. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study confirms it is possible to derive guidelines on the use of qPCR for monitoring the control of legionellae with consequent improvement to response and public health protection.

Indexed as

Real-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionWater MicrobiologyLegionellaLegionella pneumophilaTemperatureinternational trialinterpretationLegionellamonitoringqPCRwater

Identifiers

PMID21276147
PMCPMC3564408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.