SynthesisClinical oral investigations2012
Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Survival Rate of Glass Ionomer Cement, Glass Carbomer Cement and Compomer in Occlusal and Proximal ART Restorations
ART and Hall Technique for the Management of Occlusal-proximal Caries in Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Cost-efficacy of Atraumatic Restorations (ART) Using Different Encapsulated Glass Ionomer Cement
Giomer vs Glass Ionomer Cement for ART Occlusoproximal Restorations: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy of silver modified atraumatic restorative treatment (SMART) versus atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) for caries control in primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Heating and preheating of dental restorative materials-a systematic review.Clinical oral investigations · 2020Pooled it
- Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2020Pooled it
- Survival percentages of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations and sealants in posterior teeth: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2018Pooled it
- Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Economic Evaluation of ART and Hall in Primary Molars.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT.BMC oral health · 2021Trial
- A prospective and randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of ART restorations with high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement versus conventional restorations with resin composite in Class II cavities of permanent teeth: two-year follow-up.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2021Trial
- Atraumatic restorative treatment compared to the Hall Technique for occluso-proximal carious lesions in primary molars; 36-month follow-up of a randomised control trial in a school setting.BMC oral health · 2020Trial
- Atraumatic restorative treatment-ART in early childhood caries in babies: 4 years of randomized clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2019Trial
- Randomized clinical trial of class II restoration in permanent teeth comparing ART with composite resin after 12 months.Clinical oral investigations · 2019Trial
- Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2019Trial
- Clinical wear of approximal glass ionomer restorations protected with a nanofilled self-adhesive light-cured protective coating.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2018Trial
- Randomized clinical trial of encapsulated and hand-mixed glass-ionomer ART restorations: one-year follow-up.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2018Trial
- Effectiveness of conventional treatment using bulk-fill composite resin versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatments in primary and permanent dentition: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- One-year follow-up of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment(ART) for dental caries in children undergoing oncohematological treatment: a pragmatic trial.BMC oral health · 2015Trial
- One year survival of ART and conventional restorations in patients with disability.BMC oral health · 2014Trial
- Atraumatic restorative treatment and Carisolv use for root caries in the elderly: 2-year follow-up randomized clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2014Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledThe purpose of this study is to perform a systematic investigation plus meta-analysis into survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations using high-viscosity glass ionomers and to compare the results with those from the 2005 ART meta-analysis. Until February 2010, four databases were searched. Two hundred four publications were found, and 66 reported on ART restorations or sealant survival. Based on five exclusion criteria, two independent reviewers selected the 29 publications that accounted for the meta-analysis. Confidence intervals (CI) and or standard errors were calculated and the heterogeneity variance of the survival rates was estimated. Location (school/clinic) was an independent variable. The survival rates of single-surface and multiple-surface ART restorations in primary teeth over the first 2 years were 93% (CI, 91-94%) and 62% (CI, 51-73%), respectively; for single-surface ART restorations in permanent teeth over the first 3 and 5 years it was 85% (CI, 77-91%) and 80% (CI, 76-83%), respectively and for multiple-surface ART restorations in permanent teeth over 1 year it was 86% (CI, 59-98%). The mean annual dentine lesion incidence rate, in pits and fissures previously sealed using ART, over the first 3 years was 1%. No location effect and no differences between the 2005 and 2010 survival rates of ART restorations and sealants were observed. The short-term survival rates of single-surface ART restorations in primary and permanent teeth, and the caries-preventive effect of ART sealants were high. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: ART can safely be used in single-surface cavities in both primary and permanent teeth. ART sealants have a high caries preventive effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.