Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21274581›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral investigations2012

Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis.

Rodrigo G de Amorim, Soraya C Leal, Jo E Frencken

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02217098 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

The Survival Rate of Glass Ionomer Cement, Glass Carbomer Cement and Compomer in Occlusal and Proximal ART Restorations

TypeinterventionalSponsorDaniela Prócida RaggioRan2014 to 2018Enrolled530ConditionsCaries Involving Multiple Surfaces of Tooth, Dental Caries on Chewing Surface of Tooth, Dental Caries Extending Into DentineArmsGIC Restorations, Carbomer Restorations, Compomer Restorations
NCT02569047 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

ART and Hall Technique for the Management of Occlusal-proximal Caries in Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2015 to 2018Enrolled131ConditionsDental CariesArmsAtraumatic Restorative Treatment, Hall Technique
NCT02730000 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Cost-efficacy of Atraumatic Restorations (ART) Using Different Encapsulated Glass Ionomer Cement

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2016 to 2018Enrolled148ConditionsDental CariesArmsART with Equia, ART with Riva Self Cure
NCT02962713 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Giomer vs Glass Ionomer Cement for ART Occlusoproximal Restorations: a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2017 to 2019Enrolled182ConditionsDental CariesArmsART with Equia, ART with Giomer Beautifil-Bulk Restorative
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rodrigo G de AmorimDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Science, University of Brasilia, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Soraya C Leal
Jo E Frencken

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe purpose of this study is to perform a systematic investigation plus meta-analysis into survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations using high-viscosity glass ionomers and to compare the results with those from the 2005 ART meta-analysis. Until February 2010, four databases were searched. Two hundred four publications were found, and 66 reported on ART restorations or sealant survival. Based on five exclusion criteria, two independent reviewers selected the 29 publications that accounted for the meta-analysis. Confidence intervals (CI) and or standard errors were calculated and the heterogeneity variance of the survival rates was estimated. Location (school/clinic) was an independent variable. The survival rates of single-surface and multiple-surface ART restorations in primary teeth over the first 2 years were 93% (CI, 91-94%) and 62% (CI, 51-73%), respectively; for single-surface ART restorations in permanent teeth over the first 3 and 5 years it was 85% (CI, 77-91%) and 80% (CI, 76-83%), respectively and for multiple-surface ART restorations in permanent teeth over 1 year it was 86% (CI, 59-98%). The mean annual dentine lesion incidence rate, in pits and fissures previously sealed using ART, over the first 3 years was 1%. No location effect and no differences between the 2005 and 2010 survival rates of ART restorations and sealants were observed. The short-term survival rates of single-surface ART restorations in primary and permanent teeth, and the caries-preventive effect of ART sealants were high. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: ART can safely be used in single-surface cavities in both primary and permanent teeth. ART sealants have a high caries preventive effect.

Indexed as

Dental Atraumatic Restorative TreatmentDental CariesDental ClinicsDental FissuresDental Restoration FailureDentinGlass Ionomer CementsHumansSchools, DentalSurvival AnalysisTooth, DeciduousGlass Ionomer Cements

Identifiers

PMID21274581
PMCPMC3308010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.