ArticleEnvironmental management2011
Long-term benthic macroinvertebrate community monitoring to assess pollution abatement effectiveness.
Article in Environmental management, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consideration of spatial and temporal scales in stream restorations and biotic monitoring to assess restoration outcomes: A literature review, Part 1.River research and applications · 2020Article
- Pollution-induced community tolerance in benthic macroinvertebrates of a mildly lead-contaminated lake.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2017Article
- Recovery of fish communities in a warm water stream following pollution abatement.Environmental management · 2011Article
- Application of biochemical and physiological indicators for assessing recovery of fish populations in a disturbed stream.Environmental management · 2011Article
- Importance of data management in a long-term biological monitoring program.Environmental management · 2011Article
- Introduction to the biological monitoring and abatement program.Environmental management · 2011Article
- Long-term water-quality changes in East Fork Poplar Creek, Tennessee: background, trends, and potential biological consequences.Environmental management · 2011Article
- Twenty-five years of ecological recovery of East Fork Poplar Creek: review of environmental problems and remedial actions.Environmental management · 2011Review
- Monitoring fish contaminant responses to abatement actions: factors that affect recovery.Environmental management · 2011Article
- Role of a comprehensive toxicity assessment and monitoring program in the management and ecological recovery of a wastewater receiving stream.Environmental management · 2011Article
- Long-term biological monitoring of an impaired stream: synthesis and environmental management implications.Environmental management · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The benthic macroinvertebrate community of East Fork Poplar Creek (EFPC) in East Tennessee was monitored for 18 years to evaluate the effectiveness of a water pollution control program implemented at a major United States (U.S.) Department of Energy facility. Several actions were implemented to reduce and control releases of pollutants into the headwaters of the stream. Four of the most significant actions were implemented during different time periods, which allowed assessment of each action. Macroinvertebrate samples were collected annually in April from three locations in EFPC (EFK24, EFK23, and EFK14) and two nearby reference streams from 1986 through 2003. Significant improvements occurred in the macroinvertebrate community at the headwater sites (EFK24 and EFK23) after implementation of each action, while changes detected 9 km further downstream (EFK14) could not be clearly attributed to any of the actions. Because the stream was impacted at its origin, invertebrate recolonization was primarily limited to aerial immigration, thus, recovery has been slow. As recovery progressed, abundances of small pollution-tolerant taxa (e.g., Orthocladiinae chironomids) decreased and longer lived taxa colonized (e.g., hydropsychid caddisflies, riffle beetles, Baetis). While assessments lasting three to four years may be long enough to detect a response to new pollution controls at highly impacted locations, more time may be needed to understand the full effects. Studies on the effectiveness of pollution controls can be improved if impacted and reference sites are selected to maximize spatial and temporal trending, and if a multidisciplinary approach is used to broadly assess environmental responses (e.g., water quality trends, invertebrate and fish community assessments, toxicity testing, etc.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
21274531What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.