Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21274270›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedicine & biotechnology2011

Animal models of bacterial keratitis.

Mary E Marquart

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. ThemBio · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Staphylococcal Enterotoxins Promote Virulence in Bacterial Keratitis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Microbial Adherence to Contact Lenses andPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Key Role of Staphylococcal Fibronectin-Binding Proteins During the Initial Stage ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Pathobiology ofMicroorganisms · 2019
    Article
  15. An Eye onToxins · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Ex vivo rabbit and human corneas as models for bacterial and fungal keratitis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2017
    Article
  20. Effect of Different Antibiotic Chemotherapies onFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary E MarquartDepartment of Microbiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA. mmarquart@umc.edu
State Street (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial keratitis is a disease of the cornea characterized by pain, redness, inflammation, and opacity. Common causes of this disease are Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Animal models of keratitis have been used to elucidate both the bacterial factors and the host inflammatory response involved in the disease. Reviewed herein are animal models of bacterial keratitis and some of the key findings in the last several decades.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsEye Infections, BacterialHumansKeratitisMiceMice, TransgenicPseudomonas aeruginosaRabbitsStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID21274270
PMCPMC3022227
OpenAlexW2085531002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.