Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21272822›Full record

Trial reportAcademic pediatrics

Using baby books to increase new mothers' safety practices.

Stephanie M Reich, Emily K Penner, Greg J Duncan

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02203617 nacompletednot on this map

Using Baby Books to Promote Maternal and Child Health

TypeinterventionalSponsorVanderbilt UniversityRan2005 to 2010Enrolled198ConditionsCondition 1 - Educational Condition (Educational Book Group), Condition 2 - Non-educational Condition (Non-educational Book Group), Condition 3 - Control Condition (No-book Group)ArmsEducational Content/Pediatric Anticipatory Guidance, Book provision
NCT02376673 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Children's Book to Brochures for Safe Sleep Education in an At-Risk Population Enrolled in a Home Visitation Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorChildren's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiRan2014 to 2016Enrolled282ConditionsSudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)ArmsChildren's Book, Standard Brochures
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. The Effect of Baby Books on Mothers' Reading Beliefs and Reading Practices.Journal of applied developmental psychology · 2014
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Making home safe for children.APSP journal of case reports · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephanie M ReichDepartment of Education, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-5500, USA. smreich@uci.edu
Emily K Penner
Greg J Duncan

Funding

Using Baby Books to Promote Maternal and Child HealthR01HD047749 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BICKMAN, LEONARD · 2005 to 2008
$1.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD047749NICHD NIH HHS R01HD047749-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether educational baby books are an effective method for increasing low-income, first-time mothers' safety practices during their child's first 18 months.

methodsPrimiparous women (n = 167) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: an educational book group, a noneducational book group, or a no-book group. Home visits and interviews measured safety practices when women were in their third trimester of pregnancy (baseline) and when their children were 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months of age.

resultsWomen in the educational book group had fewer risks in their homes and exercised more safety practices than the no-book group (- 20% risk reduction; effect size = -.30). When the safety practices involved little time or expense (eg, putting away sharp objects), the educational book group was significantly more likely to engage in these behaviors than the no-book group (40% higher practices; effect size = 0.19) or noneducational book group (27% higher practices; effect size = 0.13). However, no differences were found between groups for behaviors that required high effort in time, money, or hassle (eg, installing latches on cabinets).

conclusionsEducational baby books appear to be an easy and low-cost way to increase the safety practices of new mothers, especially if the practices involve little to no time, money, or hassle.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSafetyAdultBooksFemaleHumansInfantInfant CareInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicLinear ModelsMother-Child RelationsMothersPatient Education as TopicPovertyPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID21272822
PMCPMC3043459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.