ArticleBMC medical genomics2011
The use of ultra-dense array CGH analysis for the discovery of micro-copy number alterations and gene fusions in the cancer genome.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Carbohydrate-dependent interaction between AMY1A/AMY2B copy number variation and APOA5 rs651821 associated with hypertriglyceridemia in Korean middle-aged adults.BMC nutrition · 2026Article
- The inverse relationship between copy number variation burden and age of onset of metabolic syndrome in Korean middle-aged adults.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- The mechanisms involved in the resistance of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells to palbociclib are multiple and change over time.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021Article
- Copy Number Variations in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Piecing the Mosaic Tiles Together through a Systems Biology Approach.Molecular neurobiology · 2018Review
- Chromosomal copy number alterations and HPV integration in cervical precancer and invasive cancer.Carcinogenesis · 2016Article
- Chromosome-breakage genomic instability and chromothripsis in breast cancer.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Somatic mutations, genome mosaicism, cancer and aging.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2014Review
- PAIR: paired allelic log-intensity-ratio-based normalization method for SNP-CGH arrays.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2013Article
- Ultradense array CGH and discovery of micro-copy number alterations and gene fusions in the cancer genome.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2013Article
- Genome wide analysis of chromosomal alterations in oral squamous cell carcinomas revealed over expression of MGAM and ADAM9.PloS one · 2013Article
- Copy number amplification of the PIK3CA gene is associated with poor prognosis in non-lymph node metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2012Article
- Difference of Genome-Wide Copy Number Alterations between High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions and Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Uterine Cervix.Korean journal of pathology · 2012Article
- Direct mutation analysis by high-throughput sequencing: from germline to low-abundant, somatic variants.Mutation research · 2012Review
- DNA fragmentation simulation method (FSM) and fragment size matching improve aCGH performance of FFPE tissues.PloS one · 2012Article
- Article
- Characterising chromosome rearrangements: recent technical advances in molecular cytogenetics.Heredity · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMolecular alterations critical to development of cancer include mutations, copy number alterations (amplifications and deletions) as well as genomic rearrangements resulting in gene fusions. Massively parallel next generation sequencing, which enables the discovery of such changes, uses considerable quantities of genomic DNA (> 5 ug), a serious limitation in ever smaller clinical samples. However, a commonly available microarray platforms such as array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) allows the characterization of gene copy number at a single gene resolution using much smaller amounts of genomic DNA. In this study we evaluate the sensitivity of ultra-dense array CGH platforms developed by Agilent, especially that of the 1 million probe array (1 M array), and their application when whole genome amplification is required because of limited sample quantities.
methodsWe performed array CGH on whole genome amplified and not amplified genomic DNA from MCF-7 breast cancer cells, using 244 K and 1 M Agilent arrays. The ADM-2 algorithm was used to identify micro-copy number alterations that measured less than 1 Mb in genomic length.
resultsDNA from MCF-7 breast cancer cells was analyzed for micro-copy number alterations, defined as measuring less than 1 Mb in genomic length. The 4-fold extra resolution of the 1 M array platform relative to the less dense 244 K array platform, led to the improved detection of copy number variations (CNVs) and micro-CNAs. The identification of intra-genic breakpoints in areas of DNA copy number gain signaled the possible presence of gene fusion events. However, the ultra-dense platforms, especially the densest 1 M array, detect artifacts inherent to whole genome amplification and should be used only with non-amplified DNA samples.
conclusionsThis is a first report using 1 M array CGH for the discovery of cancer genes and biomarkers. We show the remarkable capacity of this technology to discover CNVs, micro-copy number alterations and even gene fusions. However, these platforms require excellent genomic DNA quality and do not tolerate relatively small imperfections related to the whole genome amplification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.