Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21270517›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2011

Selective targeting of histone methylation.

Abul B M M K Islam, William F Richter, Nuria Lopez-Bigas, Elizaveta V Benevolenskaya

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Protein modification regulated autophagy inFrontiers in physiology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reversible LSD1 inhibition interferes with global EWS/ETS transcriptional activity and impedes Ewing sarcoma tumor growth.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Coordinated repression of cell cycle genes by KDM5A and E2F4 during differentiation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Abul B M M K IslamResearch Unit on Biomedical Informatics, Department of Experimental Health and Sciences, PRBB, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
William F Richter
Nuria Lopez-Bigas
Elizaveta V Benevolenskaya
Pompeu Fabra University · ESUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

RBP2 regulation through differential recruitment to genomic lociR01CA138631 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI BENEVOLENSKAYA, ELIZAVETA V · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138631NCI NIH HHS R01CA138631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histones are post-translationally modified by multiple histone-modifying enzymes, which in turn influences gene expression. Much of the work in the field to date has focused on genetic, biochemical and structural characterization of these enzymes. The most recent genome-wide methods provide insights into specific recruitment of histone-modifying enzymes in vivo and, therefore, onto mechanisms of establishing a differential expression pattern. Here we focus on the recruitment mechanisms of the enzymes involved in the placement of two contrasting histone marks, histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) methylation and histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27) methylation. We describe distribution of their binding sites and show that recruitment of different histone-modifying proteins can be coordinated, opposed, or alternating. Specifically, genomic sites of the H3K4 histone demethylase KDM5A become accessible to its homolog KDM5B in cells with a lowered KDM5A level. The currently available data on recruitment of H3K4/H3K27 modifying enzymes suggests that the formed protein complexes are targeted in a sequential and temporal manner, but that additional, still unknown, interactions contribute to targeting specificity.

Indexed as

Protein Processing, Post-TranslationalAnimalsBinding SitesCell LineChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEnhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 ProteinEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression RegulationHistone DemethylasesHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHistonesHumansJumonji Domain-Containing Histone DemethylasesLysineChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDrosophila ProteinsEnhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 ProteinEzh2 protein, mouseHistone DemethylasesHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHistonesJarid2 protein, mouseJumonji Domain-Containing Histone DemethylasesKDM5A protein, humanKDM5B protein, humanKDM6A protein, humanLysineNerve Tissue ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPolycomb-Group ProteinsPolycomb Repressive Complex 2Repressor ProteinsRetinoblastoma-Binding Protein 2trx protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID21270517
PMCPMC3115016
OpenAlexW2129191426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.