ReviewThe Journal of nutrition2011
Systems genetics of mineral metabolism.
Review in The Journal of nutrition, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of Ionomic Profiles of Spinal Cords in a Rat Model with Bone Cancer Pain.Journal of pain research · 2024Article
- Edible Halophytes with Functional Properties: In Vitro Protein Digestibility and Bioaccessibility and Intestinal Absorption of Minerals and Trace Elements from Australian Indigenous Halophytes.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Interplay among miR-29 family, mineral metabolism, and gene regulation in Bos indicus muscle.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2020Article
- Breed Ancestry, Divergence, Admixture, and Selection Patterns of the Simbra Crossbreed.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- The nutritional requirements ofGenes & nutrition · 2019Review
- Analysis of micromineral contents of school meals.Nutrition research and practice · 2014Article
- Genome-wide RNAi ionomics screen reveals new genes and regulation of human trace element metabolism.Nature communications · 2014Article
- In silico ionomics segregates parasitic from free-living eukaryotes.Genome biology and evolution · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Minerals are essential and toxic elements that have an impact on human health. Although we have learned a tremendous amount about the metabolism, biological roles, and health effects of minerals with the tools of biochemistry, cell biology, and molecular genetics, there are gaps in our knowledge of mineral biology that will benefit from new approaches. Forward genetics, whereby variations in phenotypes are mapped to natural genetic variation in the genome, has been successfully used to increase our understanding of many biologically important traits but has not yet been used extensively for mineral metabolism. In addition, the well-appreciated existence of interactions between minerals justifies a broader, systems approach to the study of mineral metabolism, i.e., ionomics. This short review will explain the value of forward genetics and ionomics as tools for exploring mammalian mineral metabolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.