Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21270282›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2011

Intranasal vaccination with the recombinant Listeria monocytogenes ΔactA prfA* mutant elicits robust systemic and pulmonary cellular responses and secretory mucosal IgA.

Jin Qiu, Lin Yan, Jianbo Chen, Crystal Y Chen, Ling Shen, Norman L Letvin, Barton F Haynes, Nancy Freitag, Lijun Rong, James T Frencher and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Immunization of Vγ2Vδ2 T cells programs sustained effector memory responses that control tuberculosis in nonhuman primates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jin QiuDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.
Lin Yan
Jianbo Chen
Crystal Y Chen
Ling Shen
Norman L Letvin
Barton F Haynes
Nancy Freitag
Lijun Rong
James T Frencher
Dan Huang
Xunming Wang
Zheng W Chen
Illinois College · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USBeth Israel Deaconess Hospital · USDuke University · USShenzhen Third People’s Hospital · CNUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

MODEL OF AIDS VIRUS-RELATED PULMONARY TUBERCULOSISR01HL064560 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CHEN, ZHENG W · 1999 to 2014
$9.5M
Immunotherapeutics and vaccines against anthrax, plague and tularemiaU01AI070426 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CHEN, ZHENG W · 2006 to 2010
$4.7M
SIV/MYCOBACTERIUM COINFECTIONR01RR013601 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CHEN, ZHENG W · 1998 to 2008
$4.4M
NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR013601NCRR NIH HHS RR13601NHLBI NIH HHS HL64560NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL064560NIAID NIH HHS AI070426NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI070426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously showed that recombinant (r) Listeria monocytogenes carrying ΔactA and a selected prfA* mutation (r-Listeria ΔactA prfA*) secreted >100-fold more immunogen in broth culture than wild-type r-Listeria or r-Listeria ΔactA and elicited much greater cellular and humoral immune responses than r-Listeria ΔactA after intravenous vaccination of mice. Here, we conducted comparative studies evaluating vaccine-elicited immune responses in systemic and mucosal sites after intranasal, intravenous, intraperitoneal, or subcutaneous immunization of mice with r-Listeria ΔactA prfA* vaccine candidates. Intranasal vaccination of mice with r-Listeria ΔactA prfA* vaccine candidates elicited a robust gamma interferon-positive (IFN-γ(+)) cellular response in systemic sites, although intravenous or intraperitoneal immunization was more efficient. Surprisingly, intranasal vaccination elicited an appreciable pulmonary IFN-γ(+) cellular response that was nonstatistically higher than the magnitude induced by the intravenous route but was significantly greater than that elicited by subcutaneous immunization. Furthermore, although intranasal r-Listeria ΔactA prfA* delivery induced poor systemic IgG responses, intranasal vaccination elicited appreciable secretory immunogen-specific IgA titers that were similar to or higher in mucosal fluid than those induced by subcutaneous and intravenous immunizations. Thus, intranasal vaccination with r-Listeria ΔactA prfA* appears to be a useful approach for eliciting robust systemic and pulmonary cellular responses and measurable secretory mucosal IgA titers.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBacterial VaccinesFemaleImmunoglobulin A, SecretoryInjections, IntraperitonealInjections, IntravenousInjections, SubcutaneousListeria monocytogenesLungMembrane ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPeptide Termination FactorsactA protein, Listeria monocytogenesAntibodies, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBacterial VaccinesImmunoglobulin A, SecretoryMembrane ProteinsPeptide Termination FactorsPrfA protein, Listeria monocytogenesVaccines, Attenuated

Identifiers

PMID21270282
PMCPMC3122559
OpenAlexW2104288569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.