Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21270186›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes care2011

Urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio is a practical outpatient tool for identifying hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-{alpha}/hepatocyte nuclear factor 4-{alpha} maturity-onset diabetes of the young from long-duration type 1 diabetes.

Rachel E J Besser, Maggie H Shepherd, Timothy J McDonald, Beverley M Shields, Bridget A Knight, Sian Ellard, Andrew T Hattersley

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes care, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Random non-fasting C-peptide: bringing robust assessment of endogenous insulin secretion to the clinic.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2016
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. C-peptide in Precision Diabetes Care and Beyond: A Comprehensive Review.Clinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Screening of Mutations in Maturity-onset Diabetes of the Young-related Genes andJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Developing services to support the delivery of care to people with early-onset type 2 diabetes.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young-New Approaches for Disease Modelling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel E J BesserPeninsula National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Facility, Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Maggie H Shepherd
Timothy J McDonald
Beverley M Shields
Bridget A Knight
Sian Ellard
Andrew T Hattersley
National Health Service · GB

Funding

Department of Health PDA/02/06/098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHepatocyte nuclear factor 1-α (HNF1A)/hepatocyte nuclear factor 4-α (HNF4A) maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is frequently misdiagnosed as type 1 diabetes, and patients are inappropriately treated with insulin. Blood C-peptide can aid in the diagnosis of MODY, but practical reasons limit its widespread use. Urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio (UCPCR), a stable measure of endogenous insulin secretion, is a noninvasive alternative. We aimed to compare stimulated UCPCR in adults with HNF1A/4A MODY, type 1 diabetes, and type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsAdults with diabetes for ≥ 5 years, without renal impairment, were studied (HNF1A MODY [n = 54], HNF4A MODY [n = 23], glucokinase MODY [n = 20], type 1 diabetes [n = 69], and type 2 diabetes [n = 54]). The UCPCR was collected in boric acid 120 min after the largest meal of the day and mailed for analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify optimal UCPCR cutoffs to differentiate HNF1A/4A MODY from type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

resultsUCPCR was lower in type 1 diabetes than HNF1A/4A MODY (median [interquartile range]) (<0.02 nmol/mmol [<0.02 to <0.02] vs. 1.72 nmol/mmol [0.98-2.90]; P < 0.0001). ROC curves showed excellent discrimination (area under curve [AUC] 0.98) and identified a cutoff UCPCR of ≥ 0.2 nmol/mmol for differentiating HNF1A/4A MODY from type 1 diabetes (97% sensitivity, 96% specificity). UCPCR was lower in HNF1A/4A MODY than in type 2 diabetes (1.72 nmol/mmol [0.98-2.90] vs. 2.47 nmol/mmol [1.4-4.13]); P = 0.007). ROC curves showed a weak distinction between HNF1A/4A MODY and type 2 diabetes (AUC 0.64).

conclusionsUCPCR is a noninvasive outpatient tool that can be used to discriminate HNF1A and HNF4A MODY from long-duration type 1 diabetes. To differentiate MODY from type 1 diabetes of >5 years' duration, UCPCR could be used to determine whether genetic testing is indicated.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersC-PeptideCreatinineDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-alphaHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4HumansInsulinMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsBiomarkersC-PeptideCreatinineHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-alphaHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4HNF4A protein, humanInsulin

Identifiers

PMID21270186
PMCPMC3024335
OpenAlexW2172115272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.