Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21269493›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2011

Genomic sequencing and analysis of a Chinese hamster ovary cell line using Illumina sequencing technology.

Stephanie Hammond, Jeffrey C Swanberg, Mihailo Kaplarevic, Kelvin H Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Proteomic analysis of Chinese hamster ovary cells.Journal of proteome research · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Engineering genes for predictable protein expression.Protein expression and purification · 2012
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephanie HammondDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19711, USA.
Jeffrey C Swanberg
Mihailo Kaplarevic
Kelvin H Lee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells are among the most widely used hosts for therapeutic protein production. Yet few genomic resources are available to aid in engineering high-producing cell lines.

resultsHigh-throughput Illumina sequencing was used to generate a 1x genomic coverage of an engineered CHO cell line expressing secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP). Reference-guided alignment and assembly produced 3.57 million contigs and CHO-specific sequence information for ~ 18,000 mouse and ~ 19,000 rat orthologous genes. The majority of these genes are involved in metabolic processes, cellular signaling, and transport and represent attractive targets for cell line engineering.

conclusionsThis demonstrates the applicability of next-generation sequencing technology and comparative genomic analysis in the development of CHO genomic resources.

Indexed as

Alkaline PhosphataseAnimalsCHO CellsComputational BiologyCricetinaeCricetulusMiceMolecular Sequence DataRatsSequence Analysis, DNAAlkaline Phosphatase

Identifiers

PMID21269493
PMCPMC3038171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.