ArticleBiomedical engineering online2011
Osteoblastic differentiation and stress response of human mesenchymal stem cells exposed to alternating current electric fields.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 142 citations in OpenAlex.
- Triple-Frequency Electromagnetic Stimulation Combined with Fingolimod Reduces Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation and Metastasis-Associated Extracellular Vesicle Protein Levels.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Heat shock protein-mediated remodeling of the bone immune microenvironment: mechanisms and precision therapeutic strategies for osteoporosis.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- A validated in vitro approach for low-frequency alternating-current stimulation of stem cells: From electrode characterization to biological responses.Protoplasma · 2026Article
- Clinical Applications of Biophysical Stimuli Technologies for Bone Healing.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Parameter-resolved AC electrical stimulation links electrical system characteristics to early transcriptional responses in human stem cells.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- The Bionic Interface: Considering the Material Mediated Electrical Stimulation of Stem Cells.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Dynamic microenvironments for bone organoids: spatiotemporal regulation of angiogenic-osteogenic coupling through advanced hydrogel design.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- At the Pointy End of Mechanobiology: AFM for Transient Biomechanical Analysis.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Review
- Review
- Article
- Electrical stimulation for cartilage tissue engineering - A critical review from an engineer's perspective.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Comparison of pulsed and continuous electromagnetic field generated by WPT system on human dermal and neural cells.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Conductive gradient hydrogels allow spatial control of adult stem cell fate.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2024Article
- Concentric-mineralized hybrid silk-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineeringJournal of materials chemistry. B · 2023Article
- Synergetic Effect of Electrical and Topographical Cues in Aniline Trimer-Based Polyurethane Fibrous Scaffolds on Tissue Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Article
- Electromagnetic Fields Generated by the IteraCoil Device Differentiate Mesenchymal Stem Progenitor Cells Into the Osteogenic Lineage.Bioelectromagnetics · 2022Article
- Long-term stimulation with alternating electric fields modulates the differentiation and mineralization of human pre-osteoblasts.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Electric field stimulation for tissue engineering applications.BMC biomedical engineering · 2021Review
- Biophysical Stimuli as the Fourth Pillar of Bone Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundElectric fields are integral to many biological events, from maintaining cellular homeostasis to embryonic development to healing. The application of electric fields offers substantial therapeutic potential, while optimal dosing regimens and the underlying mechanisms responsible for the positive clinical impact are poorly understood.
methodsThe purpose of this study was to track the differentiation profile and stress response of human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) undergoing osteogenic differentiation during exposure to a 20 mV/cm, 60 kHz electric field. Morphological and biochemical changes were imaged using endogenous two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF) and quantitatively assessed through eccentricity calculations and extraction of the redox ratio from NADH, FAD and lipofuscin contributions. Real time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR) were used to track osteogenic differentiation markers, namely alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and collagen type 1 (col1), and stress response markers, such as heat shock protein 27 (hsp27) and heat shock protein 70 (hsp70). Comparisons of collagen deposition between the stimulated hMSCs and controls were examined through second harmonic generation (SHG) imaging.
resultsQuantitative differences in cell morphology, as described through an eccentricity ratio, were found on days 2 and days 5 (p < 0.05) in samples exposed to the electric field. A delayed but two fold increase in ALP and col1 transcript was detected by week 2 (p < 0.05) in differentiating hMSCs exposed to an electric field in comparison to the nonstimulated controls. Upregulation in stress marker, hsp27, and type 1 collagen deposition were correlated with this response. Increases in NADH, FAD, and lipofuscin were traced in the stimulation group during the first week of field exposure with differences statistically significant on day 10 (p < 0.05). Changes in hsp27 expression correlate well with changes in lipofuscin detected in the stimulation group, suggesting a connection with oxidative stress. Both differentiation factors and electrical stimulation improved hMSC differentiation potential to bone based on calcium deposition on day 28.
conclusionsElectrical stimulation is a useful tool to improve hMSC osteogenic differentiation, while heat shock proteins may reveal underlying mechanisms, and optical non-invasive imaging may be used to monitor the induced morphological and biochemical changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.